Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TCBX vs SBSI vs FFIN vs TCBI vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
TCBX vs SBSI vs FFIN vs TCBI vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $555M | $1.02B | $4.83B | $4.49B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $367M | $450M | $826M | $1.95B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $66M | $71M | $254M | $357M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 49.2% | 71.8% | 48.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 18.8% | 37.5% | 19.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 10.1x | 16.5x | 13.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $137M | $734M | $22M | $951M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $384M | $1.08B | $1.90B | $343.34B |
TCBX vs SBSI vs FFIN vs TCBI vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Third Coast Bancsha… (TCBX) | 100 | 149.6 | +49.6% |
| Southside Bancshare… (SBSI) | 100 | 84.5 | -15.5% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| Texas Capital Bancs… (TCBI) | 100 | 180.2 | +80.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCBX vs SBSI vs FFIN vs TCBI vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCBX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBI's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBI's 0.4%
SBSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.78, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.23x
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 16.5x)
- Beta 0.78 vs TCBI's 1.09
- 4.2% yield, vs FFIN's 2.2%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 0.68x
TCBI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 431.3%
- PEG 0.31 vs FFIN's 3.67
- 13.5% NII/revenue growth vs SBSI's -8.1%
- +32.7% vs FFIN's -5.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs TCBX's 196.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% NII/revenue growth vs SBSI's -8.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBI's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs TCBI's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs TCBI's 0.4% |
TCBX vs SBSI vs FFIN vs TCBI vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TCBX vs SBSI vs FFIN vs TCBI vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
TCBX leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • SBSI leads 1 • TCBI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 764.0x TCBX's $367M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBSI's 15.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $367M | $450M | $826M | $1.9B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $131M | $320M | $410M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $66M | $71M | $254M | $357M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $52M | $283M | $885M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +49.2% | +71.8% | +48.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +18.8% | +37.5% | +19.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +15.8% | +30.7% | +18.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +11.5% | +34.3% | +45.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | +9.9% | -7.7% | +76.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TCBX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, TCBX trades at a 44% valuation discount to FFIN's 19.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TCBI offers better value at 0.34x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $555M | $1.0B | $4.8B | $4.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $516M | $1.4B | $3.8B | $3.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.58x | 15.03x | 19.01x | 14.93x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.27x | 10.15x | 16.54x | 13.28x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | — | 4.22x | 0.34x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.73x | 16.59x | 11.79x | 7.38x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 2.44x | 5.85x | 2.25x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.23x | 2.52x | 1.27x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.52x | 13.94x | 15.72x | 12.91x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for SBSI. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBI scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.1% | +8.5% | +14.2% | +9.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.8% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +3.7% | +12.4% | +7.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +5.5% | +16.6% | +2.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.87x | 0.01x | 0.26x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $350M | -$1.1B | -$947M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $384M | $1.1B | $1.9B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $137M | $734M | $22M | $951M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | 0.47x | 1.54x | 0.54x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCBX five years ago would be worth $29,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, TCBI leads with a +32.7% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +15.4% | +13.5% | +10.9% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | +25.3% | -5.5% | +32.7% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.1% | +37.9% | +24.3% | +92.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.7% | -0.2% | -25.9% | +54.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.7% | +62.6% | +136.4% | +109.7% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.8% | +11.3% | +7.5% | +24.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SBSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCBI's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBSI currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.78x | 0.78x | 1.09x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.84 | $34.51 | $38.74 | $108.92 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.66 | $26.32 | $28.11 | $73.61 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +99.8% | +86.9% | +93.2% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 61.0 | 61.3 | 52.2 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 80K | 683K | 416K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SBSI and FFIN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TCBX as "Buy", SBSI as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", TCBI as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 1.7% for SBSI (target: $35). For income investors, SBSI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.17% vs TCBI's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $35.00 | $39.25 | $106.17 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 8 | 15 | 39 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +4.2% | +2.2% | +0.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $1.43 | $0.74 | $0.38 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +3.9% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TCBX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TCBX vs SBSI vs FFIN vs TCBI vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBI) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI). Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBX) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 19. 0x. On forward P/E, Southside Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBX) delivered a total return of +196. 7%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus SBSI's +62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southside Bancshares, Inc.
(SBSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning TCBI is approximately 40% more volatile than SBSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBI) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus -8. 1% for Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 431. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 6% for Southside Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus 16. 5% for Southside Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus 19. 7% for SBSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (TCBI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 4% for Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (TCBI).
09Is TCBX or SBSI or FFIN or TCBI or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, TCBI: +109. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCBX and SBSI and FFIN and TCBI and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TCBX is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TCBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. TCBX, SBSI, FFIN, JPM pay a dividend while TCBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.