Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TCPA vs ET vs EPD vs TRP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
TCPA vs ET vs EPD vs TRP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $22.35B | $68.81B | $82.49B | $69.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.02B | $89.38B | $52.60B | $15.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.35B | $5.55B | $5.80B | $3.52B |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 22.9% | 13.6% | 49.8% |
| Operating Margin | 42.8% | 11.1% | 13.5% | 44.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 13.1x | 13.3x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $38.89B | $71.61B | $34.93B | $60.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.08B | $1.27B | $1.25B | $261M |
TCPA vs ET vs EPD vs TRP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Transfer LP (ET) | 100 | 245.1 | +145.1% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| TC Energy Corporati… (TRP) | 100 | 161.7 | +61.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCPA vs ET vs EPD vs TRP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCPA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 3.9%, EPS growth 14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- PEG 0.74 vs EPD's 1.44
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 17.8x)
ET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 6.5%
- 140.6% 10Y total return vs TRP's 147.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.10, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.22x
EPD is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 7.5% ROA vs TCPA's 1.6%, ROIC 8.3% vs 5.2%
TRP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 10.3% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4%
- 23.2% margin vs ET's 6.2%
- +42.9% vs TCPA's -0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 17.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs ET's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs TCPA's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, vs EPD's 5.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs TCPA's -0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs TCPA's 1.6%, ROIC 8.3% vs 5.2% |
TCPA vs ET vs EPD vs TRP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TCPA vs ET vs EPD vs TRP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRP leads in 3 of 6 categories
ET leads 1 • EPD leads 1 • TCPA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ET is the larger business by revenue, generating $89.4B annually — 8.9x TCPA's $10.0B. TRP is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ET's 6.2%. On growth, TRP holds the edge at +199.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.0B | $89.4B | $52.6B | $15.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.3B | $15.5B | $9.7B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | $5.6B | $5.8B | $3.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $418M | $5.5B | $3.0B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +22.9% | +13.6% | +49.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.8% | +11.1% | +13.5% | +44.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +6.2% | +11.0% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +6.2% | +5.6% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | +32.1% | -2.9% | +199.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | -2.8% | +2.7% | +1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ET leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, TCPA trades at a 74% valuation discount to TRP's 27.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TCPA offers better value at 0.74x vs EPD's 1.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.4B | $68.8B | $82.5B | $69.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $60.2B | $139.1B | $116.2B | $113.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.30x | 14.81x | 14.35x | 27.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.12x | 13.28x | 17.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.74x | — | 1.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.77x | 9.43x | 12.19x | 16.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 0.83x | 1.57x | 6.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.48x | 2.73x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.89x | 27.82x | 45.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EPD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPD delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $5 for TCPA. EPD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRP's 1.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCPA scores 6/9 vs ET's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +11.6% | +19.3% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +4.1% | +7.5% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +6.3% | +8.3% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +7.9% | +10.9% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 1.45x | 1.14x | 1.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $37.8B | $70.3B | $33.7B | $60.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $261M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38.9B | $71.6B | $34.9B | $60.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 2.64x | 5.21x | 2.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ET five years ago would be worth $26,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,926 for TCPA. Over the past 12 months, TRP leads with a +42.9% total return vs TCPA's -0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRP at 25.4% vs TCPA's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.7% | +24.6% | +22.1% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.7% | +22.3% | +28.5% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +93.9% | +71.7% | +97.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +168.8% | +107.0% | +74.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +140.6% | +116.5% | +147.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.2% | +24.7% | +19.7% | +25.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TRP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCPA's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.10x | -0.00x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.99 | $20.66 | $39.73 | $67.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.28 | $16.18 | $30.01 | $46.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +96.8% | +96.0% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 53.2 | 50.9 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 14.8M | 4.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ET and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ET as "Buy", EPD as "Buy", TRP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -3.0% upside for EPD (target: $37) vs -6.5% for TRP (target: $62). For income investors, ET offers the higher dividend yield at 6.47% vs TRP's 3.71%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.00 | $37.00 | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 | 45 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +6.5% | +5.6% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.49 | $1.29 | $2.14 | $3.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.3% |
TRP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ET leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TCPA vs ET vs EPD vs TRP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the stronger pick with 10.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (TCPA) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Transfer LP (ET) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP?
On trailing P/E, TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (TCPA) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus TC Energy Corporation at 27. 8x. On forward P/E, Energy Transfer LP is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Transfer LP (ET) delivered a total return of +168.
8%, compared to -0. 7% for TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (TCPA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRP returned +147. 4% versus TCPA's -0. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
01β versus TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6's 1. 09β — meaning TCPA is approximately -14693% more volatile than TRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 165% for TC Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is pulling ahead at 10.
3% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 grew EPS 14. 6% year-over-year, compared to -26. 2% for TC Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRP leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP?
TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (TCPA) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus 5. 9% for Energy Transfer LP — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRP leads at 44. 2% versus 11. 4% for ET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRP leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Energy Transfer LP (ET) trades at 13.
1x forward P/E versus 17. 8x for TC Energy Corporation — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPD: -3. 0% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Energy Transfer LP (ET) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 3. 7% for TC Energy Corporation (TRP).
09Is TCPA or ET or EPD or TRP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
01), 3. 7% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRP: +147. 4%, TCPA: -0. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCPA and ET and EPD and TRP?
These companies operate in different sectors (TCPA (Industrials) and ET (Energy) and EPD (Energy) and TRP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TCPA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TRP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.