Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TDAC vs NUVB vs HCAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Industrial - Machinery
TDAC vs NUVB vs HCAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Biotechnology | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $183M | $1.67B | $16M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $143M | $41M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-146M | $1M |
| Gross Margin | 69.9% | 91.6% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | -18.4% | -105.0% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $348K | $10M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $438K | $164M | $29K |
TDAC vs NUVB vs HCAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Translational Devel… (TDAC) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 244.7 | +144.7% |
| Hauchen AI Parking … (HCAI) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TDAC vs NUVB vs HCAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDAC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.00, yield 0.3%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs NUVB's -51.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 3.09x
NUVB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- 7.0% revenue growth vs HCAI's 19.4%
- +136.3% vs HCAI's -94.0%
HCAI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 3.7% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
- 3.0% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8%, ROIC 4.2% vs -54.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs HCAI's 19.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs NUVB's -102.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs NUVB's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs HCAI's -94.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8%, ROIC 4.2% vs -54.3% |
TDAC vs NUVB vs HCAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TDAC vs NUVB vs HCAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCAI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB is the larger business by revenue, generating $143M annually — 134.2x TDAC's $1M. HCAI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUVB's -102.1%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $143M | $41M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$917,269 | -$145M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$146M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$126M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.9% | +91.6% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | -105.0% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -102.1% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -79.9% | -88.1% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.0% | -72.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | +106.3% | -62.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TDAC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $183M | $1.7B | $16M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $183M | $1.5B | $27M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -656.17x | -8.03x | 9.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 172.05x | 26.61x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 5.38x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCAI delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NUVB. TDAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCAI's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCAI scores 7/9 vs NUVB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | -44.1% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | -23.8% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | -54.3% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | -42.8% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$90,674 | -$154M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $438,174 | $164M | $28,654 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $347,500 | $10M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.23x | -162.11x | 4.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDAC five years ago would be worth $10,619 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,259 for HCAI. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs HCAI's -94.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs HCAI's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -43.8% | +61.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.5% | +136.3% | -94.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | +197.5% | -87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -58.3% | -87.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -51.8% | -87.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | +43.8% | -49.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TDAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDAC currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs HCAI's 4.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 2.04x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.69 | $9.75 | $318.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.15 | $1.57 | $0.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +49.4% | +4.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 59.1 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 4.3M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDAC as "Buy", NUVB as "Buy". TDAC is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.40 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HCAI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDAC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
TDAC vs NUVB vs HCAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDAC or NUVB or HCAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 4% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (HCAI). Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (HCAI) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Translational Development Acquisition Corp. (TDAC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TDAC or NUVB or HCAI?
Over the past 5 years, Translational Development Acquisition Corp.
(TDAC) delivered a total return of +6. 2%, compared to -87. 4% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (HCAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDAC returned +6. 2% versus HCAI's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TDAC or NUVB or HCAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Translational Development Acquisition Corp.
(TDAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 00β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NUVB is approximately 88483% more volatile than TDAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Translational Development Acquisition Corp. (TDAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 42% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TDAC or NUVB or HCAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus 19. 4% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (HCAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Translational Development Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 86. 5% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co. , Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TDAC or NUVB or HCAI?
Hauchen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (HCAI) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCAI leads at 5. 5% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TDAC or NUVB or HCAI?
In this comparison, TDAC (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NUVB, HCAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TDAC or NUVB or HCAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Translational Development Acquisition Corp.
(TDAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 00)). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDAC: +6. 2%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TDAC and NUVB and HCAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (TDAC (Financial Services) and NUVB (Healthcare) and HCAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TDAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCAI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.