Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TDW vs SOLV vs BAX vs OII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
TDW vs SOLV vs BAX vs OII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $3.87B | $12.41B | $9.04B | $3.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.35B | $8.26B | $11.32B | $2.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $298M | $1.43B | $-1.10B | $339M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 53.7% | 30.1% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.0% | 25.5% | -2.7% | 10.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.8x | 11.1x | 9.2x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $655M | $5.04B | $10.00B | $487M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $579M | $878M | $1.97B | $689M |
TDW vs SOLV vs BAX vs OII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tidewater Inc. (TDW) | 100 | 84.6 | -15.4% |
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
| Baxter Internationa… (BAX) | 100 | 41.0 | -59.0% |
| Oceaneering Interna… (OII) | 100 | 156.3 | +56.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TDW vs SOLV vs BAX vs OII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.74, current ratio 2.90x
- 22.2% margin vs BAX's -9.7%
SOLV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 5.7% revenue growth vs TDW's 0.5%
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 20.5x)
- 3.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
OII is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 142.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 16.7% 10Y total return vs SOLV's -10.4%
- +99.0% vs BAX's -41.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs TDW's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs BAX's -9.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs BAX's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.0% vs BAX's -41.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs BAX's -5.4%, ROIC 15.2% vs -1.4% |
TDW vs SOLV vs BAX vs OII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TDW vs SOLV vs BAX vs OII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OII leads in 2 of 6 categories
BAX leads 1 • TDW leads 0 • SOLV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TDW and SOLV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAX is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.3B annually — 8.4x TDW's $1.3B. TDW is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BAX's -9.7%. On growth, BAX holds the edge at +2.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $8.3B | $11.3B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $477M | $2.9B | $671M | $394M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $298M | $1.4B | -$1.1B | $339M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $282M | -$203M | $501M | $240M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +53.7% | +30.1% | +20.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +25.5% | -2.7% | +10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +17.3% | -9.7% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | -2.5% | +4.4% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -3.0% | +2.9% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.5% | -91.0% | -112.0% | -26.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SOLV trades at a 31% valuation discount to TDW's 11.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SOLV's 6.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAX's 25.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $12.4B | $9.0B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $16.6B | $17.1B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.73x | 8.07x | -10.01x | 10.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.79x | 11.07x | 9.17x | 20.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.15x | 6.20x | 25.37x | 8.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.86x | 1.49x | 0.80x | 1.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.86x | 2.49x | 1.47x | 3.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.96x | — | 27.99x | 17.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OII leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OII delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-16 for BAX. OII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAX's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDW scores 8/9 vs BAX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.8% | +30.7% | -16.5% | +34.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.4% | +10.0% | -5.4% | +13.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.2% | +16.9% | -1.4% | +23.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.2% | +19.0% | -1.7% | +17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 1.00x | 1.64x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $76M | $4.2B | $8.0B | -$201M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $579M | $878M | $2.0B | $689M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $655M | $5.0B | $10.0B | $487M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.05x | 6.55x | -0.83x | 7.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDW five years ago would be worth $55,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,566 for BAX. Over the past 12 months, OII leads with a +99.0% total return vs BAX's -41.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OII at 29.3% vs BAX's -24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.1% | -9.3% | -10.2% | +47.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.5% | +9.4% | -41.8% | +99.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.9% | -10.4% | -56.3% | +115.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +456.1% | -10.4% | -74.3% | +137.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | -10.4% | -42.4% | +16.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.1% | -3.6% | -24.1% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDW and OII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDW is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAX's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OII currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs BAX's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.05x | 1.37x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $93.13 | $88.20 | $32.68 | $40.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.24 | $62.38 | $15.73 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +81.2% | +53.6% | +91.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 60.6 | 44.0 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 852K | 1.3M | 8.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDW as "Hold", SOLV as "Buy", BAX as "Hold", OII as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 50.3% upside for TDW (target: $117) vs -9.8% for OII (target: $33). BAX is the only dividend payer here at 3.87% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $117.00 | $97.80 | $19.75 | $33.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 11 | 36 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
OII leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TDW vs SOLV vs BAX vs OII: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baxter International Inc.
(BAX) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Tidewater Inc. (TDW). Solventum Corporation (SOLV) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solventum Corporation (SOLV) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII?
On trailing P/E, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus Tidewater Inc. at 11. 7x. On forward P/E, Baxter International Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII?
Over the past 5 years, Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) delivered a total return of +456. 1%, compared to -74. 3% for Baxter International Inc. (BAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OII returned +16. 7% versus TDW's -67. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Baxter International Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning BAX is approximately 85% more volatile than TDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oceaneering International, Inc. (OII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 164% for Baxter International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baxter International Inc.
(BAX) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus 0. 5% for Tidewater Inc. (TDW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Solventum Corporation grew EPS 221. 7% year-over-year, compared to -37. 8% for Baxter International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDW leads at 27. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII?
Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -8. 5% for Baxter International Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOLV leads at 26. 2% versus -2. 7% for BAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOLV leads at 53. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Baxter International Inc.
(BAX) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Oceaneering International, Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDW: 50. 3% to $117. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII?
In this comparison, BAX (3.
9% yield) pays a dividend. TDW, SOLV, OII do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TDW or SOLV or BAX or OII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDW: -67. 7%, SOLV: -10. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TDW and SOLV and BAX and OII?
These companies operate in different sectors (TDW (Energy) and SOLV (Healthcare) and BAX (Healthcare) and OII (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TDW is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOLV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OII is a small-cap deep-value stock. BAX pays a dividend while TDW, SOLV, OII do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.