TDY vs CW

For growth investors, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the stronger pick with 12.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY). Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (26. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the cheapest at 33.

4x versus Curtiss-Wright Corporation at 56. 2x. On forward P/E, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated is actually cheaper at 26. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teledyne Technologies Incorporated wins at 2. 14x versus Curtiss-Wright Corporation's 2. 20x.

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +449.

0%, compared to +44. 7% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CW returned +815. 8% versus TDY's +573. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

95β versus Curtiss-Wright Corporation's 1. 23β — meaning CW is approximately 30% more volatile than TDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 52% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is pulling ahead at 12.

1% versus 7. 9% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Curtiss-Wright Corporation grew EPS 22. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 7% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CW leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

6% net margin versus 13. 8% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDY leads at 18. 8% versus 18. 2% for CW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDY leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 14x versus Curtiss-Wright Corporation's 2. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) trades at 26. 2x forward P/E versus 48. 0x for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — 21. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDY: 12. 8% to $711. 33.

In this comparison, CW (0.

1% yield) pays a dividend. TDY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

95), +573. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDY: +573. 5%, CW: +815. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TDY (Technology) and CW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.