TE
T1 Energy Inc
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$889M
5Y Perf.-37.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TE vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
Solar
Market Cap$875M
5Y Perf.-69.7%
TE vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TE | SPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $889M | $875M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $224M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-547M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 35.6% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -79.2% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.2x |
| Total Debt | $713M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $73M | $10M |
TE vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TE
SPWR
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Energy Inc (TE) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TE vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SPWR leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. T1 Energy Inc is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TE
T1 Energy Inc
The Long-Run Compounder
TE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -46.3% 10Y total return vs SPWR's -81.1%
- +321.6% vs SPWR's -42.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
The Income Pick
SPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.13
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 65.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.13, current ratio 0.73x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SPWR | 2.9% revenue growth vs TE's -393.5% |
| Quality / Margins | SPWR | -13.2% margin vs TE's -243.6% |
| Stability / Safety | SPWR | Beta 2.13 vs TE's 2.49 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TE | +321.6% vs SPWR's -42.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SPWR | -19.5% ROA vs TE's -39.2%, ROIC -5.3% vs -8.9% |
TE vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2015
FY 2024
TE vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSPWRLAGGINGTE
TET1 Energy Inc
1leads
SPWRSunPower Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SPWR5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SPWR2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SPWR7/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TE6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPWR and TE operate at a comparable scale, with $315M and $224M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -13.2% (SPWR) to -2.4% (TE).
| Metric | TET1 Energy Inc | SPWRSunPower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $224M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$105M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$547M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$55M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.2% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.4% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -101.3% |
SPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TET1 Energy Inc | SPWRSunPower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $889M | $875M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.65x | -15.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 302.01x | 2.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.12x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
SPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPWR scores 5/9 vs TE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TET1 Energy Inc | SPWRSunPower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.2% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.9% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.3% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $641M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $73M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $713M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.08x | -1.57x |
SPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TE five years ago would be worth $5,291 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,890 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, TE leads with a +321.6% total return vs SPWR's -42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TE at -10.7% vs SPWR's -42.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TET1 Energy Inc | SPWRSunPower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.8% | -37.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +321.6% | -42.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | -81.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.1% | -81.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.3% | -81.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | -42.6% |
TE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TE and SPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPWR is the less volatile stock with a 2.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TE's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TE currently trades 53.9% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 45.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TET1 Energy Inc | SPWRSunPower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.78 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.93 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.9% | +45.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.1M | 1.7M |
Evenly matched — TE and SPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TE as "Buy" and SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1435.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 99.2% for TE (target: $11).
| Metric | TET1 Energy Inc | SPWRSunPower Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.50 | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SPWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallSunPower Inc. (SPWR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TE vs SPWR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TE or SPWR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate T1 Energy Inc (TE) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TE or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, T1 Energy Inc (TE) delivered a total return of -47.
1%, compared to -81. 1% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TE returned -46. 3% versus SPWR's -81. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TE or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 13β versus T1 Energy Inc's 2. 49β — meaning TE is approximately 17% more volatile than SPWR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TE or SPWR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SunPower Inc.
grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -527. 5% for T1 Energy Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TE or SPWR?
SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 5% net margin versus -153. 0% for T1 Energy Inc — meaning it keeps -10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPWR leads at -2. 0% versus -25. 2% for TE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TE or SPWR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1435.
0% to $15. 81.
07Which pays a better dividend — TE or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is TE or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T1 Energy Inc (TE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TE: -46. 3%, SPWR: -81. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TE and SPWR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TE (Industrials) and SPWR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.