TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$63.43B
5Y Perf.+166.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEL vs HUBB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$26.71B
5Y Perf.+310.3%
TEL vs HUBB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEL | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $63.43B | $26.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.52B | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.91B | $906M |
| Gross Margin | 35.4% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 20.8% |
| Forward P/E | 19.3x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $6.55B | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.25B | $483M |
TEL vs HUBB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEL
HUBB
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEL vs HUBB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Hubbell Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
The Income Pick
TEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth -40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- 7.9% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
The Long-Run Compounder
HUBB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 413.6% 10Y total return vs TEL's 299.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 67.6%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEL | 7.9% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8% |
| Value | TEL | Lower P/E (19.3x vs 25.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | TEL | 15.7% margin vs HUBB's 15.1% |
| Stability / Safety | HUBB | Beta 1.38 vs TEL's 1.58 |
| Dividends | TEL | 1.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs HUBB's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEL | +47.5% vs HUBB's +45.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HUBB | 11.6% ROA vs TEL's 11.5%, ROIC 17.1% vs 14.1% |
TEL vs HUBB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TEL vs HUBB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTELLAGGINGHUBB
HUBBHubbell Incorporated
3leads
TELTE Connectivity Ltd.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HUBBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TEL4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TEL5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
HUBB7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
HUBB5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
HUBB2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TEL2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.5B annually — 3.1x HUBB's $6.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.7% (TEL) to 15.1% (HUBB). On growth, TEL holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | HUBBHubbell Incorpora… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.5B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.9B | $906M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.4B | $909M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +20.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +15.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.0% | +8.3% |
TEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TEL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.4x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 13% valuation discount to TEL's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEL's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUBB's 21.2x.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | HUBBHubbell Incorpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $63.4B | $26.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.7B | $28.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.09x | 30.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.28x | 25.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.97x | 21.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.71x | 4.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.08x | 6.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.80x | 30.53x |
TEL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $22 for TEL. TEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBB's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs TEL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | HUBBHubbell Incorpora… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.5% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.1% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.9% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.3B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $483M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 31.48x | 16.90x |
HUBB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUBB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUBB five years ago would be worth $26,328 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,812 for TEL. Over the past 12 months, TEL leads with a +47.5% total return vs HUBB's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUBB at 24.1% vs TEL's 22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | HUBBHubbell Incorpora… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.0% | +8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.5% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.6% | +91.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.1% | +163.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +299.1% | +413.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.2% | +24.1% |
HUBB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEL's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUBB currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs TEL's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | HUBBHubbell Incorpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $252.56 | $565.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $147.75 | $346.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +88.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 542K |
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEL as "Buy" and HUBB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for TEL (target: $263) vs 6.5% for HUBB (target: $535). For income investors, TEL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.24% vs HUBB's 1.07%.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | HUBBHubbell Incorpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $262.57 | $535.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.69 | $5.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.8% |
TEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TEL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HUBB leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Best OverallTE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEL vs HUBB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEL or HUBB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TE Connectivity Ltd.
(TEL) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEL or HUBB?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 30.
4x versus TE Connectivity Ltd. at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, TE Connectivity Ltd. is actually cheaper at 19. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEL or HUBB?
Over the past 5 years, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) delivered a total return of +163.
3%, compared to +68. 1% for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBB returned +413. 6% versus TEL's +299. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEL or HUBB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
38β versus TE Connectivity Ltd. 's 1. 58β — meaning TEL is approximately 15% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 68% for Hubbell Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEL or HUBB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TE Connectivity Ltd.
(TEL) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hubbell Incorporated grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -40. 4% for TE Connectivity Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBB leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEL or HUBB?
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
2% net margin versus 10. 8% for TE Connectivity Ltd. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 18. 8% for TEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBB leads at 35. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEL or HUBB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TE Connectivity Ltd.
(TEL) trades at 19. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Hubbell Incorporated — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEL: 21. 5% to $262. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEL or HUBB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB).
09Is TEL or HUBB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +413. 6% 10Y return). TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +413. 6%, TEL: +299. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEL and HUBB?
These companies operate in different sectors (TEL (Technology) and HUBB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEL: 14.5% · HUBB: 11.1%)Net Margin>
%
(TEL: 15.7% · HUBB: 15.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEL: 35.1x · HUBB: 30.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.