TEL vs ROG

For growth investors, TE Connectivity Ltd.

(TEL) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) offers the better valuation at 35. 1x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, TE Connectivity Ltd.

is actually cheaper at 19. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, TE Connectivity Ltd.

(TEL) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -26. 4% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEL returned +299. 1% versus ROG's +122. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rogers Corporation (ROG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

24β versus TE Connectivity Ltd. 's 1. 58β — meaning TEL is approximately 28% more volatile than ROG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rogers Corporation (ROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 51% for TE Connectivity Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TE Connectivity Ltd.

(TEL) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -2. 3% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TE Connectivity Ltd. grew EPS -40. 4% year-over-year, compared to -340. 0% for Rogers Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEL leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TE Connectivity Ltd.

(TEL) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -7. 6% for Rogers Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEL leads at 18. 8% versus 6. 4% for ROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEL leads at 34. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, TE Connectivity Ltd.

(TEL) trades at 19. 3x forward P/E versus 38. 6x for Rogers Corporation — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEL: 21. 5% to $262. 57.

In this comparison, TEL (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. ROG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, TE Connectivity Ltd.

(TEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +299. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEL: +299. 1%, ROG: +122. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

TEL pays a dividend while ROG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.