Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TEN vs DHT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • GR
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.+223.4%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+218.9%

TEN vs DHT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TEN logoTEN
DHT logoDHT
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.30B$3.05B
Revenue (TTM)$779M$498M
Net Income (TTM)$110M$211M
Gross Margin33.4%38.3%
Operating Margin27.0%45.1%
Forward P/E6.4x7.0x
Total Debt$1.76B$429M
Cash & Equiv.$348M$79M

TEN vs DHTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TEN
DHT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN)100323.4+223.4%
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT)100318.9+218.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TEN vs DHT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TEN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. DHT Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Income Pick

TEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 5.6%
  • Rev growth -9.6%, EPS growth -44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
  • -9.6% revenue growth vs DHT's -13.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

DHT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 334.7% 10Y total return vs TEN's 73.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 37.8%, current ratio 2.80x
  • Beta 0.27, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.80x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTEN logoTEN-9.6% revenue growth vs DHT's -13.0%
ValueTEN logoTENLower P/E (6.4x vs 7.0x)
Quality / MarginsDHT logoDHT42.4% margin vs TEN's 14.1%
Stability / SafetyDHT logoDHTBeta 0.27 vs TEN's 0.33, lower leverage
DividendsTEN logoTEN5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DHT's 3.9%
Momentum (1Y)TEN logoTEN+156.6% vs DHT's +77.4%
Efficiency (ROA)DHT logoDHT14.3% ROA vs TEN's 3.0%, ROIC 8.9% vs 6.9%

TEN vs DHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited
FY 2021
Clean Air Division
67.7%$8.1B
Ride Performance Division
24.2%$2.9B
Powertrain
6.3%$755M
Motorparts
1.9%$223M
DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Voyage Charter Revenues
70.7%$351M
Time Charter Revenues
29.3%$146M

TEN vs DHT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTENLAGGINGDHT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DHT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

TEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $779M annually — 1.6x DHT's $498M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 42.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEN's 14.1%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +9.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$779M$498M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$327M$331M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$110M$211M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$503M-$33M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.4%+38.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.0%+45.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.1%+42.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-64.5%-6.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.7%+9.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-71.6%+20.6%
DHT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.6x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 41% valuation discount to DHT's 14.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEN's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DHT's 12.3x.

MetricTEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$3.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.7B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.58x14.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.44x6.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.49x12.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.62x6.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.72x2.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DHT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

DHT delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for TEN. DHT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEN's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.2%+19.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.0%+14.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.9%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.00x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.4B$350M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$348M$79M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.8B$429M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.06x15.92x
DHT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TEN five years ago would be worth $47,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,557 for DHT. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +156.6% total return vs DHT's +77.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 42.1% vs DHT's 38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+99.5%+64.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+156.6%+77.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+186.7%+166.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+376.2%+285.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.7%+334.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+42.1%+38.7%
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TEN and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.33x0.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$44.14$20.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.02$10.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.8%+92.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.061.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded504K4.7M
Evenly matched — TEN and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates TEN as "Buy" and DHT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for TEN (target: $50) vs -5.0% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.64% vs DHT's 3.91%.

MetricTEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2616
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.6%+3.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.43$0.74
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). DHT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallTsakos Energy Navigation Li… (TEN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TEN vs DHT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TEN or DHT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger pick with -9.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TEN or DHT?

On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.

6x versus DHT Holdings, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TEN or DHT?

Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +376.

2%, compared to +285. 6% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DHT returned +334. 7% versus TEN's +73. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TEN or DHT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited's 0. 33β — meaning TEN is approximately 23% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 100% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TEN or DHT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is pulling ahead at -9.

6% versus -13. 0% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 4% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TEN or DHT?

DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 21. 9% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEN leads at 34. 6% versus 34. 2% for DHT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHT leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TEN or DHT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 6.

4x forward P/E versus 7. 0x for DHT Holdings, Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 15. 8% to $50. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TEN or DHT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 3. 9% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT).

09

Is TEN or DHT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 3. 9% yield, +334. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHT: +334. 7%, TEN: +73. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TEN and DHT?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TEN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DHT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TEN and DHT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TEN: -9.7% · DHT: 9.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(TEN: 14.1% · DHT: 42.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TEN: 8.6x · DHT: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.