TEN vs STNG

For growth investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger pick with -9.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.

7x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited wins at 0. 09x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +415.

4%, compared to +359. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEN returned +77. 4% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited's 0. 33β — meaning TEN is approximately 19% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 100% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is pulling ahead at -9.

6% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited grew EPS -44. 4% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 21. 9% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEN leads at 34. 6% versus 33. 0% for STNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 13. 6% to $50. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STNG: +62. 8%, TEN: +77. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.