TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.-31.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TENB vs CHKP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CHKP
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$12.05B
5Y Perf.+5.4%
TENB vs CHKP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TENB | CHKP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2.47B | $12.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $2.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $1.06B |
| Gross Margin | 78.2% | 85.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 29.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.1x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $466M | $1.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $1.80B |
TENB vs CHKP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TENB
CHKP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 68.9 | -31.1% |
| Check Point Softwar… (CHKP) | 100 | 105.4 | +5.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TENB vs CHKP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TENB and CHKP are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play
TENB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 3.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 11.0% revenue growth vs CHKP's 6.3%
- Lower P/E (11.1x vs 11.1x)
Best for: growth exposure
CHKP
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
The Income Pick
CHKP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.36
- 40.1% 10Y total return vs TENB's -28.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 68.4%, current ratio 2.05x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TENB | 11.0% revenue growth vs CHKP's 6.3% |
| Value | TENB | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 11.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | CHKP | 38.4% margin vs TENB's -1.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CHKP | Beta 0.36 vs TENB's 1.12, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TENB | -31.2% vs CHKP's -47.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHKP | 15.8% ROA vs TENB's -0.7%, ROIC 23.2% vs 0.2% |
TENB vs CHKP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TENB vs CHKP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHKPLAGGINGTENB
TENBTenable Holdings, Inc.
1leads
CHKPCheck Point Software …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TENBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CHKP4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TENB4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHKP7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CHKP4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHKP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHKP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 2.7x TENB's $1.0B. CHKP is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TENB's -1.2%. On growth, TENB holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TENBTenable Holdings,… | CHKPCheck Point Softw… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $909M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $263M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.2% | +85.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +29.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +38.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +47.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.3% | +5.8% |
CHKP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TENB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CHKP's 13.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TENB's 63.6x.
| Metric | TENBTenable Holdings,… | CHKPCheck Point Softw… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -71.80x | 12.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.06x | 11.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 63.60x | 13.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 4.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.93x | 4.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.69x | 9.97x |
TENB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHKP leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHKP delivers a 36.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TENB. CHKP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TENB's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHKP scores 6/9 vs TENB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TENBTenable Holdings,… | CHKPCheck Point Softw… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | +36.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +23.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.1% | +17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.43x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $278M | $172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $466M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.02x | — |
CHKP leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHKP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHKP five years ago would be worth $9,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,806 for TENB. Over the past 12 months, TENB leads with a -31.2% total return vs CHKP's -47.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHKP at -1.9% vs TENB's -16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TENBTenable Holdings,… | CHKPCheck Point Softw… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | -36.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.2% | -47.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | -3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.8% | +40.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.2% | -1.9% |
CHKP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TENB and CHKP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHKP is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TENB's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TENB currently trades 60.4% from its 52-week high vs CHKP's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TENBTenable Holdings,… | CHKPCheck Point Softw… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.69 | $233.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.73 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.4% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 30.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 1.3M |
Evenly matched — TENB and CHKP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TENB as "Buy" and CHKP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.2% upside for CHKP (target: $154) vs 29.7% for TENB (target: $28).
| Metric | TENBTenable Holdings,… | CHKPCheck Point Softw… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.94 | $153.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.0% | +11.6% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CHKP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TENB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallCheck Point Software Techno… (CHKP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TENB vs CHKP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TENB or CHKP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 3% for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP). Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TENB or CHKP?
On forward P/E, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TENB or CHKP?
Over the past 5 years, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
(CHKP) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -41. 9% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHKP returned +40. 1% versus TENB's -28. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TENB or CHKP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
(CHKP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus Tenable Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning TENB is approximately 214% more volatile than CHKP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 143% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TENB or CHKP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus 6. 3% for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. grew EPS 29. 0% year-over-year, compared to 3. 2% for Tenable Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TENB leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TENB or CHKP?
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
(CHKP) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHKP leads at 30. 5% versus 0. 1% for TENB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHKP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TENB or CHKP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 1x for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHKP: 33. 2% to $153. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — TENB or CHKP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TENB or CHKP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
(CHKP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHKP: +40. 1%, TENB: -28. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TENB and CHKP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHKP is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TENB: 9.6% · CHKP: 4.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.