Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TENB vs VRNS vs CYBR vs RPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
TENB vs VRNS vs CYBR vs RPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2.42B | $3.24B | $20.64B | $439M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $660M | $1.36B | $859M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-137M | $-147M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 78.2% | 78.1% | 74.3% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | -21.9% | -7.7% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 233.2x | 81.9x | 4.2x |
| Total Debt | $466M | $572M | $1.22B | $1.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $202M | $623M | $247M |
TENB vs VRNS vs CYBR vs RPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 67.7 | -32.3% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 98.2 | -1.8% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 100 | 415.1 | +315.1% |
| Rapid7, Inc. (RPD) | 100 | 13.4 | -86.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TENB vs VRNS vs CYBR vs RPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TENB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
VRNS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CYBR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.92
- Rev growth 36.0%, EPS growth -38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.0%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs VRNS's 303.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 50.9%, current ratio 2.00x
RPD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 81.9x)
- 2.6% margin vs VRNS's -20.7%
- 1.3% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 1.1% vs -11.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.0% revenue growth vs RPD's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 81.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs VRNS's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs TENB's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.9% vs RPD's -72.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 1.1% vs -11.0% |
TENB vs VRNS vs CYBR vs RPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TENB vs VRNS vs CYBR vs RPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RPD leads in 2 of 6 categories
CYBR leads 2 • TENB leads 1 • VRNS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TENB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CYBR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.1x VRNS's $660M. RPD is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRNS's -20.7%. On growth, VRNS holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $660M | $1.4B | $859M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | -$135M | $23M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$137M | -$147M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $263M | $120M | $259M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.2% | +78.1% | +74.3% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | -21.9% | -7.7% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -20.7% | -10.8% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +18.1% | +19.0% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +26.9% | +18.5% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.3% | 0.0% | +83.2% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RPD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RPD's 21.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CYBR's 908.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $3.2B | $20.6B | $439M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $3.6B | $21.2B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -70.53x | -24.43x | -139.54x | 18.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.86x | 233.19x | 81.87x | 4.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 62.59x | — | 908.21x | 21.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.42x | 5.20x | 15.16x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.79x | 5.96x | 8.54x | 2.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.52x | 24.06x | 79.60x | 3.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RPD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RPD delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. CYBR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPD's 6.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TENB scores 5/9 vs CYBR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | -27.4% | -6.1% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | -8.2% | -3.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | -11.0% | -3.2% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.1% | -14.0% | -3.3% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.43x | 0.96x | 0.51x | 6.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $278M | $369M | $599M | $782M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $202M | $623M | $247M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $466M | $572M | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.02x | -9.01x | — | 6.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CYBR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CYBR five years ago would be worth $35,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $893 for RPD. Over the past 12 months, CYBR leads with a +12.9% total return vs RPD's -72.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYBR at 43.4% vs RPD's -48.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.9% | -13.8% | -6.1% | -54.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.0% | -37.6% | +12.9% | -72.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.2% | +19.1% | +194.8% | -86.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.6% | -41.4% | +252.5% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.0% | +303.7% | +901.6% | -42.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.7% | +6.0% | +43.4% | -48.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TENB's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYBR currently trades 77.7% from its 52-week high vs RPD's 24.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.95x | 0.92x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.69 | $63.90 | $526.19 | $27.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.73 | $19.70 | $347.12 | $4.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.3% | +43.2% | +77.7% | +24.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 65.3 | 38.9 | 61.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.3M | 0 | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TENB as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy", CYBR as "Buy", RPD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.5% upside for RPD (target: $10) vs 12.3% for CYBR (target: $459).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.94 | $36.00 | $459.00 | $9.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 34 | 49 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.2% | +3.5% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
RPD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CYBR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
TENB vs VRNS vs CYBR vs RPD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger pick with 36. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for Rapid7, Inc. (RPD). Rapid7, Inc. (RPD) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (4. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD?
On forward P/E, Rapid7, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD?
Over the past 5 years, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) delivered a total return of +252. 5%, compared to -91. 1% for Rapid7, Inc. (RPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYBR returned +901. 6% versus RPD's -42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Tenable Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning TENB is approximately 22% more volatile than CYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 7% for Rapid7, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is pulling ahead at 36. 0% versus 1. 9% for Rapid7, Inc. (RPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tenable Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 3. 2% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for CyberArk Software Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CYBR leads at 32. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD?
Rapid7, Inc.
(RPD) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 7% net margin versus -20. 7% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RPD leads at 1. 3% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRNS leads at 79. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rapid7, Inc.
(RPD) trades at 4. 2x forward P/E versus 233. 2x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 229. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPD: 49. 5% to $9. 82.
08Which pays a better dividend — TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TENB or VRNS or CYBR or RPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), +901. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYBR: +901. 6%, TENB: -30. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TENB and VRNS and CYBR and RPD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CYBR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RPD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.