Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TENX vs ACAD vs NKTR vs SUPN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
TENX vs ACAD vs NKTR vs SUPN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $69M | $3.86B | $1.69B | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.10B | $55M | $777M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $376M | $-164M | $-29M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% | 99.6% | 89.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.4% | -237.9% | -5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 50.9x | — | 24.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $52M | $149M | $41M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $178M | $15M | $128M |
TENX vs ACAD vs NKTR vs SUPN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenax Therapeutics,… (TENX) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TENX vs ACAD vs NKTR vs SUPN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TENX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.90, current ratio 20.60x
- 428.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 34.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
- 26.2% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -57.2%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs ACAD's +52.4%
SUPN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.78
- 228.4% 10Y total return vs ACAD's -22.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 1.90x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 428.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs ACAD's +52.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -57.2% |
TENX vs ACAD vs NKTR vs SUPN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TENX vs ACAD vs NKTR vs SUPN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • SUPN leads 1 • TENX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and TENX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $55M | $777M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | $96M | -$130M | $29M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | $376M | -$164M | -$29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $212M | -$209M | $82M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.5% | +99.6% | +89.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% | -2.4% | -5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +34.3% | -3.0% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +19.4% | -3.8% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% | -25.3% | +38.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -110.5% | -81.8% | -4.5% | +81.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 53.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $69M | $3.9B | $1.7B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$26M | $3.7B | $1.8B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.13x | 9.85x | -8.57x | -76.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 50.91x | — | 24.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.91x | — | 53.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.61x | 30.64x | 4.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.93x | 3.15x | 15.66x | 2.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.74x | — | 65.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. SUPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.0% | +35.6% | -4.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -42.1% | +26.2% | -62.8% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.0% | -57.2% | -2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.0% | +10.1% | -55.7% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 1.66x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | -$126M | $134M | -$87M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $178M | $15M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $52M | $149M | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -847.57x | — | -4.74x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $17,801 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for TENX. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs ACAD's +52.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs TENX's -23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.4% | -13.7% | +92.0% | +5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +109.2% | +52.4% | +818.2% | +69.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.1% | +4.7% | +621.8% | +42.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +7.1% | -72.3% | +78.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -22.9% | -59.1% | +228.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.4% | +1.5% | +93.3% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SUPN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUPN is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUPN currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs TENX's 63.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.26x | 1.85x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.38 | $27.81 | $109.00 | $59.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.34 | $14.45 | $7.99 | $29.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.4% | +81.1% | +76.5% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 44.2 | 53.4 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 520K | 1.8M | 991K | 604K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACAD as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", SUPN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.3% upside for NKTR (target: $133) vs 14.8% for SUPN (target: $60).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.78 | $132.83 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 33 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns).
TENX vs ACAD vs NKTR vs SUPN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN?
On forward P/E, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +78. 0%, compared to -99. 6% for Tenax Therapeutics, Inc. (TENX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +228. 4% versus TENX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 136% more volatile than SUPN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tenax Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) trades at 24. 1x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 59. 3% to $132. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TENX or ACAD or NKTR or SUPN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), +228. 4% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUPN: +228. 4%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TENX and ACAD and NKTR and SUPN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TENX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.