TEVA vs SUPN vs PRGO vs LNTH

For growth investors, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(SUPN) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the cheapest at 26. 7x versus Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited at 30. 0x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to -60. 1% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +42. 9% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Perrigo Company plc's 1. 21β — meaning PRGO is approximately 167% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(SUPN) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited grew EPS 182. 8% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNTH leads at 18. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -5. 1% for SUPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUPN leads at 89. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.

5x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 208. 9% to $36. 20.

In this comparison, PRGO (9.

8% yield) pays a dividend. TEVA, SUPN, LNTH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +42. 9%, TEVA: -28. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TEVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while TEVA, SUPN, LNTH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.