Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TEVA vs VTRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
TEVA vs VTRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $42.31B | $18.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.35B | $14.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.56B | $-3.51B |
| Gross Margin | 52.1% | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | -18.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $17.38B | $14.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.56B | $1.32B |
TEVA vs VTRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teva Pharmaceutical… (TEVA) | 100 | 290.0 | +190.0% |
| Viatris Inc. (VTRS) | 100 | 93.4 | -6.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEVA vs VTRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TEVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.13
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 182.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- -24.0% 10Y total return vs VTRS's -53.8%
VTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 98.0%, current ratio 5.06x
- Beta 0.99, yield 3.0%, current ratio 5.06x
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 14.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs VTRS's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs VTRS's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs TEVA's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.4% vs VTRS's +93.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs VTRS's -9.5%, ROIC 7.7% vs -6.7% |
TEVA vs VTRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TEVA vs VTRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEVA and VTRS operate at a comparable scale, with $17.3B and $14.3B in trailing revenue. TEVA is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTRS's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.3B | $14.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | -$559M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.6B | -$3.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.1% | +35.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | -24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +30.2% |
Valuation Metrics
VTRS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.3B | $18.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56.1B | $31.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.28x | -5.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.68x | 6.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.77x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.45x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.39x | 1.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.85x | 9.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TEVA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEVA delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-24 for VTRS. VTRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEVA's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEVA scores 8/9 vs VTRS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.7% | -23.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | -7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.20x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.8B | $13.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.4B | $14.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.51x | -6.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEVA five years ago would be worth $35,311 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,151 for VTRS. Over the past 12 months, TEVA leads with a +125.4% total return vs VTRS's +93.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEVA at 58.9% vs VTRS's 21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.4% | +29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +125.4% | +93.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.0% | +77.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +253.1% | +31.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.0% | -53.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.9% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TEVA and VTRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEVA's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.35 | $16.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.99 | $8.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.5M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TEVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEVA as "Buy" and VTRS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.3% upside for TEVA (target: $39) vs -4.4% for VTRS (target: $15). VTRS is the only dividend payer here at 3.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.00 | $15.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% |
TEVA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VTRS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TEVA vs VTRS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEVA or VTRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) is the stronger pick with 4.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Viatris Inc. (VTRS). Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) offers the better valuation at 30. 3x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEVA or VTRS?
On forward P/E, Viatris Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEVA or VTRS?
Over the past 5 years, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) delivered a total return of +253.
1%, compared to +31. 5% for Viatris Inc. (VTRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEVA returned -24. 0% versus VTRS's -53. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEVA or VTRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viatris Inc.
(VTRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited's 1. 13β — meaning TEVA is approximately 14% more volatile than VTRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Viatris Inc. (VTRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEVA or VTRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) is pulling ahead at 4.
3% versus -3. 0% for Viatris Inc. (VTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited grew EPS 182. 8% year-over-year, compared to -466. 0% for Viatris Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEVA leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEVA or VTRS?
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
2% net margin versus -24. 6% for Viatris Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEVA leads at 12. 5% versus -18. 6% for VTRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEVA leads at 51. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEVA or VTRS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Viatris Inc.
(VTRS) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEVA: 7. 3% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEVA or VTRS?
In this comparison, VTRS (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. TEVA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TEVA or VTRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viatris Inc.
(VTRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTRS: -53. 8%, TEVA: -24. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEVA and VTRS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TEVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VTRS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. VTRS pays a dividend while TEVA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.