Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TEX vs ASTE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
TEX vs ASTE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $4.23B | $1.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.93B | $1.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $2.81B | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $772M | $72M |
TEX vs ASTE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation (TEX) | 100 | 408.7 | +308.7% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 126.2 | +26.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEX vs ASTE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.13, yield 1.1%
- 201.5% 10Y total return vs ASTE's 22.1%
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 14.3x)
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.63, Low D/E 46.9%, current ratio 2.49x
- Beta 1.63, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.49x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs TEX's 5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs ASTE's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.63 vs TEX's 2.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, vs ASTE's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.3% vs ASTE's +41.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs TEX's 1.6%, ROIC 6.2% vs 8.6% |
TEX vs ASTE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TEX vs ASTE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEX is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 4.0x ASTE's $1.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.9% (TEX) to 1.7% (ASTE). On growth, TEX holds the edge at +41.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $444M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $111M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $322M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.1% | +20.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +309.0% | -90.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TEX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, TEX trades at a 40% valuation discount to ASTE's 31.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEX's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASTE's 14.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.29x | 31.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.35x | 14.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.90x | 14.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.03x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.13x | 57.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASTE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEX delivers a 4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $4 for ASTE. ASTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEX's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEX scores 6/9 vs ASTE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $772M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $320M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.74x | 5.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEX five years ago would be worth $12,470 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,298 for ASTE. Over the past 12 months, TEX leads with a +64.3% total return vs ASTE's +41.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEX at 11.7% vs ASTE's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.3% | +41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | +33.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.7% | -17.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.5% | +22.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.7% | +10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TEX and ASTE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASTE is the less volatile stock with a 1.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEX's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEX currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.50 | $65.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.52 | $36.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 232K |
Analyst Outlook
TEX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEX as "Hold" and ASTE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.9% upside for TEX (target: $80) vs -32.8% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, TEX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.06% vs ASTE's 0.96%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.25 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% |
TEX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASTE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TEX vs ASTE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEX or ASTE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Terex Corporation (TEX). Terex Corporation (TEX) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEX or ASTE?
On trailing P/E, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus Astec Industries, Inc. at 31. 9x. On forward P/E, Terex Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEX or ASTE?
Over the past 5 years, Terex Corporation (TEX) delivered a total return of +24.
7%, compared to -17. 0% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEX returned +201. 5% versus ASTE's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEX or ASTE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 63β versus Terex Corporation's 2. 13β — meaning TEX is approximately 31% more volatile than ASTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 134% for Terex Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEX or ASTE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus 5. 7% for Terex Corporation (TEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -32. 9% for Terex Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEX leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEX or ASTE?
Terex Corporation (TEX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
1% net margin versus 2. 8% for Astec Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEX leads at 8. 8% versus 4. 6% for ASTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTE leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEX or ASTE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Terex Corporation (TEX) trades at 13.
3x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for Astec Industries, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEX: 24. 9% to $80. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEX or ASTE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Terex Corporation (TEX) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE).
09Is TEX or ASTE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield). Terex Corporation (TEX) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTE: +22. 1%, TEX: +201. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEX and ASTE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.