Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TFX vs UTMD vs NVCR vs MMSI vs HOLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TFX
Teleflex Incorporated

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.83B
5Y Perf.-63.7%
UTMD
Utah Medical Products, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$210M
5Y Perf.-34.3%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-75.0%
MMSI
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.72B
5Y Perf.+38.5%
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.97B
5Y Perf.+42.6%

TFX vs UTMD vs NVCR vs MMSI vs HOLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TFX logoTFX
UTMD logoUTMD
NVCR logoNVCR
MMSI logoMMSI
HOLX logoHOLX
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$5.83B$210M$1.92B$3.72B$16.97B
Revenue (TTM)$2.81B$39M$674M$1.54B$4.13B
Net Income (TTM)$-1.01B$11M$-173M$139M$544M
Gross Margin53.3%52.9%75.2%48.7%52.8%
Operating Margin5.6%29.6%-27.2%12.2%17.5%
Forward P/E19.6x10.4x15.5x17.2x
Total Debt$2.73B$225K$290M$898M$2.63B
Cash & Equiv.$393M$86M$103M$449M$1.96B

TFX vs UTMD vs NVCR vs MMSI vs HOLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TFX
UTMD
NVCR
MMSI
HOLX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Teleflex Incorporat… (TFX)10036.3-63.7%
Utah Medical Produc… (UTMD)10065.7-34.3%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10025.0-75.0%
Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI)100138.5+38.5%
Hologic, Inc. (HOLX)100142.6+42.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TFX vs UTMD vs NVCR vs MMSI vs HOLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UTMD leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Hologic, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. MMSI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TFX
Teleflex Incorporated
The Healthcare Pick

TFX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
UTMD
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
The Income Pick

UTMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 37.62x
  • Beta 0.55, yield 1.9%, current ratio 37.62x
  • Lower P/E (10.4x vs 17.2x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MMSI
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

MMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
  • 214.6% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
  • 11.7% revenue growth vs TFX's -34.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

HOLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.

  • Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
  • +37.1% vs MMSI's -33.8%
Best for: stability and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMMSI logoMMSI11.7% revenue growth vs TFX's -34.6%
ValueUTMD logoUTMDLower P/E (10.4x vs 17.2x)
Quality / MarginsUTMD logoUTMD29.3% margin vs TFX's -35.9%
Stability / SafetyHOLX logoHOLXBeta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsUTMD logoUTMD1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TFX's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HOLX logoHOLX+37.1% vs MMSI's -33.8%
Efficiency (ROA)UTMD logoUTMD9.3% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 25.0% vs -16.4%

TFX vs UTMD vs NVCR vs MMSI vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TFXTeleflex Incorporated
FY 2025
Vascular Access
46.1%$918M
Interventional
32.5%$648M
Surgical
21.0%$418M
Other
0.5%$9M
UTMDUtah Medical Products, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

MMSIMerit Medical Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Cardiovascular
95.2%$1.4B
Endoscopy
4.8%$73M
HOLXHologic, Inc.
FY 2025
Diagnostics
44.6%$1.8B
Breast Health
36.2%$1.5B
Gyn Surgical
16.6%$680M
Skeletal Health
2.7%$109M

TFX vs UTMD vs NVCR vs MMSI vs HOLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUTMDLAGGINGMMSI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UTMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HOLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 107.1x UTMD's $39M. UTMD is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TFX's -35.9%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTFX logoTFXTeleflex Incorpor…UTMD logoUTMDUtah Medical Prod…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.8B$39M$674M$1.5B$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$280M$14M-$165M$290M$974M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1.0B$11M-$173M$139M$544M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$249M$14M-$48M$274M$1000M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.3%+52.9%+75.2%+48.7%+52.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.6%+29.6%-27.2%+12.2%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-35.9%+29.3%-25.7%+9.0%+13.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.9%+37.2%-7.1%+17.8%+24.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.8%-1.2%+12.3%+7.8%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-108.7%-7.0%-100.0%+38.8%-9.2%
UTMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UTMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.8x trailing earnings, UTMD trades at a 38% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UTMD's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TFX's 18.8x.

MetricTFX logoTFXTeleflex Incorpor…UTMD logoUTMDUtah Medical Prod…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5.8B$210M$1.9B$3.7B$17.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.2B$124M$2.1B$4.2B$17.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.50x18.79x-13.80x29.26x30.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.59x10.41x15.46x17.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.48x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.82x8.64x13.06x17.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.93x5.44x2.92x2.45x4.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.88x1.78x5.51x2.38x3.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.75x14.63x17.24x18.44x
UTMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UTMD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HOLX delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. UTMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TFX's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTFX logoTFXTeleflex Incorpor…UTMD logoUTMDUtah Medical Prod…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-28.3%+9.6%-50.8%+8.9%+11.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.9%+9.3%-16.5%+5.2%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.4%+25.0%-16.4%+7.2%+9.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.0%+9.6%-28.9%+7.9%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.87x0.00x0.85x0.57x0.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.3B-$86M$187M$450M$667M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$393M$86M$103M$449M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.7B$225,000$290M$898M$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.02x-96.80x10.74x8.00x
UTMD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HOLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HOLX five years ago would be worth $11,582 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs MMSI's -33.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOLX at -2.9% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTFX logoTFXTeleflex Incorpor…UTMD logoUTMDUtah Medical Prod…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+7.9%+16.3%+28.3%-27.9%+1.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+9.0%+23.5%+1.1%-33.8%+37.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.6%-26.2%-75.7%-26.5%-8.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.4%-18.2%-91.3%-3.6%+15.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.3%+19.1%+30.3%+214.6%+124.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.4%-9.7%-37.6%-9.8%-2.9%
HOLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs MMSI's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTFX logoTFXTeleflex Incorpor…UTMD logoUTMDUtah Medical Prod…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.06x0.55x2.20x0.71x0.41x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$139.63$71.81$20.06$100.19$76.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$100.18$52.00$9.82$59.74$52.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.3%+91.1%+83.9%+62.2%+100.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.541.969.834.969.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded884K13K1.5M769K10.0M
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

UTMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TFX as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MMSI as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 0.4% for TFX (target: $132). For income investors, UTMD offers the higher dividend yield at 1.88% vs TFX's 1.02%.

MetricTFX logoTFXTeleflex Incorpor…UTMD logoUTMDUtah Medical Prod…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…HOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$132.20$33.50$95.00$79.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts29151342
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.35$1.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.1%+4.0%0.0%0.0%+4.4%
UTMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

UTMD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HOLX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallUtah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TFX vs UTMD vs NVCR vs MMSI vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

(MMSI) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 6% for Teleflex Incorporated (TFX). Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teleflex Incorporated (TFX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX?

On trailing P/E, Utah Medical Products, Inc.

(UTMD) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Utah Medical Products, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX?

Over the past 5 years, Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) delivered a total return of +15. 8%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus TFX's -10. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.

(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 437% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Utah Medical Products, Inc. (UTMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 87% for Teleflex Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

(MMSI) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -34. 6% for Teleflex Incorporated (TFX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NovoCure Limited grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1468. 2% for Teleflex Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMSI leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX?

Utah Medical Products, Inc.

(UTMD) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -45. 4% for Teleflex Incorporated — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTMD leads at 29. 6% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Utah Medical Products, Inc.

(UTMD) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 6x for Teleflex Incorporated — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX?

In this comparison, UTMD (1.

9% yield), TFX (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NVCR, MMSI, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TFX or UTMD or NVCR or MMSI or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Utah Medical Products, Inc.

(UTMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 1. 9% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTMD: +19. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TFX and UTMD and NVCR and MMSI and HOLX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

TFX, UTMD pay a dividend while NVCR, MMSI, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TFX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 31%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UTMD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MMSI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TFX and UTMD and NVCR and MMSI and HOLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TFX: -21.8% · UTMD: -1.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.