Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TGEN vs GNRC vs ERII vs ITRI vs HUBB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
TGEN vs GNRC vs ERII vs ITRI vs HUBB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $120M | $15.65B | $498M | $3.60B | $26.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $4.33B | $127M | $2.35B | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $189M | $33M | $289M | $906M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 38.1% | 64.5% | 38.6% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.3% | 7.5% | 24.1% | 13.2% | 20.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x | 22.9x | 13.5x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $1.33B | $9M | $1.29B | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $341M | $48M | $1.02B | $483M |
TGEN vs GNRC vs ERII vs ITRI vs HUBB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tecogen Inc. (TGEN) | 100 | 730.3 | +630.3% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 239.8 | +139.8% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
| Itron, Inc. (ITRI) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGEN vs GNRC vs ERII vs ITRI vs HUBB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 19.7% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1%
GNRC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +129.9% vs ERII's -37.3%
ERII has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 10.44x
- 25.9% margin vs TGEN's -30.5%
- 15.2% ROA vs TGEN's -24.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -52.7%
ITRI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 25.0x)
HUBB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- 410.7% 10Y total return vs GNRC's 6.7%
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs TGEN's -30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs TGEN's 3.43 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs ERII's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs TGEN's -24.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -52.7% |
TGEN vs GNRC vs ERII vs ITRI vs HUBB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TGEN vs GNRC vs ERII vs ITRI vs HUBB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUBB leads in 2 of 6 categories
ERII leads 1 • ITRI leads 1 • TGEN leads 0 • GNRC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 221.5x TGEN's $27M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGEN's -30.5%. On growth, GNRC holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $4.3B | $127M | $2.3B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $472M | $41M | $367M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $189M | $33M | $289M | $906M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $419M | $27M | $393M | $909M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +38.1% | +64.5% | +38.6% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | +7.5% | +24.1% | +13.2% | +20.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.5% | +4.4% | +25.9% | +12.3% | +15.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -38.1% | +9.7% | +21.4% | +16.7% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +12.4% | -97.5% | -3.3% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -173.1% | +69.9% | +100.0% | -16.9% | +8.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ITRI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, ITRI trades at a 87% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ITRI's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNRC's 34.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $120M | $15.7B | $498M | $3.6B | $26.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $111M | $16.6B | $460M | $3.9B | $28.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.07x | 99.17x | 22.45x | 12.46x | 29.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.91x | 22.91x | 13.47x | 25.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.39x | 16.23x | 10.48x | 20.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.44x | 3.72x | 3.70x | 1.52x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.11x | 5.99x | 2.48x | 2.15x | 6.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 58.38x | 28.57x | 9.44x | 29.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-51 for TGEN. ERII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITRI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITRI scores 7/9 vs TGEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.6% | +7.2% | +17.4% | +17.2% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.2% | +3.4% | +15.2% | +7.7% | +11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.7% | +5.9% | +10.3% | +13.1% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | +6.9% | +11.3% | +11.4% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.51x | 0.05x | 0.74x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $992M | -$39M | $267M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $341M | $48M | $1.0B | $483M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $1.3B | $9M | $1.3B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46.61x | 4.54x | — | 14.38x | 16.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TGEN and GNRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGEN five years ago would be worth $28,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,567 for ERII. Over the past 12 months, GNRC leads with a +129.9% total return vs ERII's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGEN at 77.6% vs ERII's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | +89.1% | -31.3% | -14.1% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.2% | +129.9% | -37.3% | -23.7% | +41.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +460.5% | +141.5% | -60.0% | +20.8% | +87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +180.2% | -18.5% | -54.3% | -7.2% | +159.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.2% | +666.1% | -11.9% | +94.4% | +410.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +77.6% | +34.2% | -26.3% | +6.5% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNRC and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGEN's 3.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs TGEN's 39.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.43x | 1.69x | 1.53x | 1.53x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.07 | $269.58 | $18.32 | $142.00 | $565.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $113.96 | $9.30 | $78.53 | $349.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.9% | +99.0% | +51.5% | +57.1% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 77.8 | 60.6 | 35.2 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 486K | 895K | 996K | 893K | 546K |
Analyst Outlook
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGEN as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", ERII as "Buy", ITRI as "Hold", HUBB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 211.2% upside for TGEN (target: $15) vs 1.7% for GNRC (target: $271). HUBB is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $271.22 | $13.00 | $137.00 | $535.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 39 | 16 | 37 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — | $5.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +7.2% | +2.8% | +0.9% |
HUBB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). ERII leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TGEN vs GNRC vs ERII vs ITRI vs HUBB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tecogen Inc.
(TGEN) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Itron, Inc. (ITRI) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tecogen Inc. (TGEN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB?
On trailing P/E, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Itron, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB?
Over the past 5 years, Tecogen Inc.
(TGEN) delivered a total return of +180. 2%, compared to -54. 3% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus ERII's -11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
38β versus Tecogen Inc. 's 3. 43β — meaning TGEN is approximately 149% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 74% for Itron, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tecogen Inc.
(TGEN) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Itron, Inc. grew EPS 25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -57. 9% for Tecogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITRI leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -30. 5% for Tecogen Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus -26. 3% for TGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERII leads at 65. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TGEN: 211. 2% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB?
In this comparison, HUBB (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. TGEN, GNRC, ERII, ITRI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGEN or GNRC or ERII or ITRI or HUBB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +410. 7% 10Y return). Tecogen Inc. (TGEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 7%, TGEN: -3. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGEN and GNRC and ERII and ITRI and HUBB?
These companies operate in different sectors (TGEN (Industrials) and GNRC (Industrials) and ERII (Industrials) and ITRI (Technology) and HUBB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TGEN is a small-cap high-growth stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ERII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUBB pays a dividend while TGEN, GNRC, ERII, ITRI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.