Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TGS vs EPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
TGS vs EPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.13B | $81.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65T | $52.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406.73B | $5.80B |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 41.3% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.67T | $34.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $803.80B | $1.25B |
TGS vs EPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 570.6 | +470.6% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 197.5 | +97.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGS vs EPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 64.8%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 449.2% 10Y total return vs EPD's 119.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
EPD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 5.7%
- Beta 0.06, yield 5.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06 vs TGS's 0.90
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.8% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs EPD's 11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs TGS's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs TGS's 4.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.7% vs TGS's +20.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs EPD's 7.5%, ROIC 19.3% vs 8.3% |
TGS vs EPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TGS vs EPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 31.4x EPD's $52.6B. TGS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPD's 11.0%. On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.65T | $52.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $885.1B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406.7B | $5.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224.2B | $3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +11.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TGS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, TGS trades at a 8% valuation discount to EPD's 14.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TGS offers better value at 0.08x vs EPD's 1.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $81.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $115.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 14.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 13.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.49x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.98x | 27.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPD delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $15 for TGS. TGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EPD's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs EPD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $868.6B | $33.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $803.8B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.67T | $34.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.01x | 5.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $69,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,572 for EPD. Over the past 12 months, EPD leads with a +31.7% total return vs TGS's +20.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 38.4% vs EPD's 20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +165.3% | +73.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +598.5% | +105.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +449.2% | +119.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.4% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EPD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EPD currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs TGS's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.35 | $39.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.74 | $29.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 344K | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
EPD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TGS as "Buy" and EPD as "Buy". For income investors, EPD offers the higher dividend yield at 5.67% vs TGS's 4.20%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1788.78 | $2.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
TGS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EPD leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
TGS vs EPD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGS or EPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger pick with 64. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGS or EPD?
On trailing P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGS or EPD?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +598. 5%, compared to +105. 7% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +449. 2% versus EPD's +119. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGS or EPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. 's 0. 90β — meaning TGS is approximately 1326% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 114% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGS or EPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is pulling ahead at 64. 8% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. grew EPS 32. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGS leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGS or EPD?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus 11. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus 13. 1% for EPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGS or EPD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGS or EPD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 4. 2% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS).
09Is TGS or EPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 5. 7% yield, +119. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPD: +119. 8%, TGS: +449. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGS and EPD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.