TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$2.13B
5Y Perf.+470.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TGS vs ET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ET
Energy Transfer LP
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$68.53B
5Y Perf.+144.1%
TGS vs ET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TGS | ET |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.13B | $68.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65T | $89.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406.73B | $5.55B |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | 41.3% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.67T | $71.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $803.80B | $1.27B |
TGS vs ET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TGS
ET
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 570.6 | +470.6% |
| Energy Transfer LP (ET) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGS vs ET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TGS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Energy Transfer LP is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.
The Growth Play
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 64.8%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 449.2% 10Y total return vs ET's 142.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ET
Energy Transfer LP
The Income Pick
ET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.19, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.19 vs TGS's 0.90
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TGS | 64.8% revenue growth vs ET's -0.1% |
| Value | TGS | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 12.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TGS | 24.6% margin vs ET's 6.2% |
| Stability / Safety | ET | Beta 0.19 vs TGS's 0.90 |
| Dividends | TGS | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ET's 6.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ET | +25.8% vs TGS's +20.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TGS | 9.6% ROA vs ET's 4.1%, ROIC 19.3% vs 6.3% |
TGS vs ET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
TGS vs ET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTGSLAGGINGET
ETEnergy Transfer LP
1leads
TGSTransportadora de Gas…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ETMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TGS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TGS4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TGS7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TGS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ET2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 18.5x ET's $89.4B. TGS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ET's 6.2%. On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TGSTransportadora de… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.65T | $89.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $885.1B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406.7B | $5.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224.2B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | +32.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -2.8% |
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, TGS trades at a 11% valuation discount to ET's 14.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGS's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ET's 9.4x.
| Metric | TGSTransportadora de… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $68.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $138.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 14.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 12.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.49x | 9.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.98x | 17.82x |
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for ET. TGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ET's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs ET's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TGSTransportadora de… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 1.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $868.6B | $70.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $803.8B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.67T | $71.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.01x | 2.64x |
TGS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $69,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,821 for ET. Over the past 12 months, ET leads with a +25.8% total return vs TGS's +20.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 38.4% vs ET's 23.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TGSTransportadora de… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +22.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | +25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +165.3% | +90.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +598.5% | +158.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +449.2% | +142.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.4% | +23.9% |
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ET is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ET currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs TGS's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TGSTransportadora de… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.35 | $20.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.74 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 344K | 14.8M |
ET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TGS and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TGS as "Buy" and ET as "Buy". For income investors, ET offers the higher dividend yield at 6.50% vs TGS's 4.20%.
| Metric | TGSTransportadora de… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1788.78 | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — TGS and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TGS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ET leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallTransportadora de Gas del S… (TGS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TGS vs ET: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGS or ET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger pick with 64. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Energy Transfer LP (ET). Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGS or ET?
On trailing P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Energy Transfer LP at 14. 8x. On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGS or ET?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +598. 5%, compared to +158. 2% for Energy Transfer LP (ET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +449. 2% versus ET's +142. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGS or ET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Energy Transfer LP (ET) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. 's 0. 90β — meaning TGS is approximately 380% more volatile than ET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 145% for Energy Transfer LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGS or ET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is pulling ahead at 64. 8% versus -0. 1% for Energy Transfer LP (ET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. grew EPS 32. 2% year-over-year, compared to 5. 5% for Energy Transfer LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGS leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGS or ET?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus 5. 9% for Energy Transfer LP — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus 11. 4% for ET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGS or ET more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Energy Transfer LP — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGS or ET?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Energy Transfer LP (ET) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 4. 2% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS).
09Is TGS or ET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Energy Transfer LP (ET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 6. 5% yield, +142. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ET: +142. 6%, TGS: +449. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGS and ET?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TGS: 37.8% · ET: 32.1%)Net Margin>
%
(TGS: 24.6% · ET: 6.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TGS: 13.1x · ET: 14.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.