Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TGS vs MPLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
TGS vs MPLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.13B | $57.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65T | $12.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406.73B | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 41.3% | 44.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.67T | $26.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $803.80B | $2.14B |
TGS vs MPLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 570.6 | +470.6% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGS vs MPLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 64.8%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 449.2% 10Y total return vs MPLX's 184.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 7.0%
- Beta 0.18, yield 7.0%, current ratio 1.23x
- 37.5% margin vs TGS's 24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.8% revenue growth vs MPLX's 8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 12.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs TGS's 24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs TGS's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TGS's 4.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.5% vs TGS's +20.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs TGS's 9.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs 19.3% |
TGS vs MPLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TGS vs MPLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 131.8x MPLX's $12.5B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGS's 24.6%. On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.65T | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $885.1B | $7.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406.7B | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224.2B | $5.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +44.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +39.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | +5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -17.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 11% valuation discount to TGS's 13.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGS's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPLX's 13.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $57.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $81.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 11.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 12.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.49x | 13.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | 4.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 3.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.98x | 13.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $15 for TGS. TGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPLX's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs MPLX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +32.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +12.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 1.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $868.6B | $24.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $803.8B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.67T | $26.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.01x | 5.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $69,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,723 for MPLX. Over the past 12 months, MPLX leads with a +22.5% total return vs TGS's +20.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 38.4% vs MPLX's 25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | +22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +165.3% | +95.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +598.5% | +157.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +449.2% | +184.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.4% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MPLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MPLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPLX currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs TGS's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.35 | $59.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.74 | $47.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 344K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MPLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TGS as "Buy" and MPLX as "Buy". For income investors, MPLX offers the higher dividend yield at 7.01% vs TGS's 4.20%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $60.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +7.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1788.78 | $3.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
MPLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TGS leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
TGS vs MPLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGS or MPLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger pick with 64. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for MPLX Lp (MPLX). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGS or MPLX?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGS or MPLX?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +598. 5%, compared to +157. 2% for MPLX Lp (MPLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +449. 2% versus MPLX's +184. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGS or MPLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
18β versus Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. 's 0. 90β — meaning TGS is approximately 394% more volatile than MPLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 180% for MPLX Lp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGS or MPLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is pulling ahead at 64. 8% versus 8. 4% for MPLX Lp (MPLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. grew EPS 32. 2% year-over-year, compared to 14. 5% for MPLX Lp. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGS leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGS or MPLX?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus 24. 7% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus 40. 3% for MPLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGS or MPLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 7x for MPLX Lp — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGS or MPLX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 4. 2% for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS).
09Is TGS or MPLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
18), 7. 0% yield, +184. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPLX: +184. 4%, TGS: +449. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGS and MPLX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.