Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TGS vs SOC vs KMI vs CIVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
TGS vs SOC vs KMI vs CIVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.13B | $1.84T | $70.10B | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65T | $1M | $17.52B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406.73B | $-498M | $3.31B | $638M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | -8.7% | 46.9% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 41.3% | -367.6% | 28.6% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 7.5x | 22.3x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.67T | $0.00 | $32.39B | $4.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $803.80B | $98M | $109M | $76M |
TGS vs SOC vs KMI vs CIVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 674.9 | +574.9% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) | 100 | 184.8 | +84.8% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGS vs SOC vs KMI vs CIVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 64.8%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 449.2% 10Y total return vs KMI's 142.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
- Beta 0.90, yield 4.2%, current ratio 5.00x
SOC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 3.7%
- PEG 0.23 vs CIVI's 0.32
- Beta 0.10 vs SOC's 1.51
CIVI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 18.2% yield, vs KMI's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.8% revenue growth vs SOC's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield, vs KMI's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.0% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 19.3% vs -44.6% |
TGS vs SOC vs KMI vs CIVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TGS vs SOC vs KMI vs CIVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGS leads in 3 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • KMI leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 1300190.7x SOC's $1M. TGS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.65T | $1M | $17.5B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $885.1B | -$454M | $7.5B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406.7B | -$498M | $3.3B | $638M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224.2B | -$611M | $3.9B | $934M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | -8.7% | +46.9% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | -367.6% | +28.6% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | -391.5% | +18.9% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | -480.4% | +22.2% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | — | +13.5% | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -5.4% | +37.5% | -33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 86% valuation discount to KMI's 23.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TGS offers better value at 0.08x vs KMI's 0.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1.84T | $70.1B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $1.84T | $102.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | -3.07x | 23.00x | 3.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 7.50x | 22.29x | 6.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | — | 0.24x | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.49x | — | 14.09x | 1.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | — | 4.14x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 2359.43x | 2.16x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.98x | — | 21.76x | 2.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. TGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMI's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | -113.8% | +10.3% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | -28.9% | +4.5% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | -44.6% | +5.6% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | -37.5% | +7.0% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | — | 1.00x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $868.6B | -$98M | $32.3B | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $803.8B | $98M | $109M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.67T | $0 | $32.4B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.01x | -2.28x | 2.86x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $69,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,194 for CIVI. Over the past 12 months, TGS leads with a +20.0% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 38.4% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +9.5% | +15.9% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | -36.8% | +18.3% | +6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +165.3% | +26.5% | +107.0% | -41.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +598.5% | +32.6% | +108.4% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +449.2% | +32.4% | +142.1% | -86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.4% | +8.2% | +27.4% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
KMI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KMI is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KMI currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.51x | 0.10x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.35 | $35.00 | $34.73 | $37.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.74 | $3.72 | $25.60 | $25.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +36.7% | +90.7% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 45.8 | 42.5 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 344K | 5.4M | 12.4M | 22.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KMI and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TGS as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", KMI as "Hold", CIVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 11.1% for KMI (target: $35). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs KMI's 3.71%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $35.00 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 4 | 34 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — | +3.7% | +18.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 9 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1788.78 | — | $1.17 | $4.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% |
TGS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TGS vs SOC vs KMI vs CIVI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger pick with 64. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 5% for Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Kinder Morgan, Inc. at 23. 0x. On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kinder Morgan, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 0. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +598. 5%, compared to +31. 9% for Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +449. 2% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kinder Morgan, Inc.
(KMI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 1494% more volatile than KMI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 100% for Kinder Morgan, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is pulling ahead at 64. 8% versus 12. 5% for Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -6. 2% for Civitas Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 0. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for Kinder Morgan, Inc. — 22. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), TGS (4. 2% yield), KMI (3. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGS or SOC or KMI or CIVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kinder Morgan, Inc.
(KMI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 3. 7% yield, +142. 1% 10Y return). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KMI: +142. 1%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGS and SOC and KMI and CIVI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KMI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock. TGS, KMI, CIVI pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.