Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TGS vs WMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
TGS vs WMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.19B | $90.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.65T | $11.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406.73B | $2.84B |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 62.8% |
| Operating Margin | 41.3% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 31.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.67T | $29.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $803.80B | $63M |
TGS vs WMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transportadora de G… (TGS) | 100 | 587.7 | +487.7% |
| The Williams Compan… (WMB) | 100 | 361.0 | +261.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGS vs WMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 64.8%, EPS growth 32.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 467.2% 10Y total return vs WMB's 357.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.5%, current ratio 5.00x
WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 2.7%
- Beta 0.17 vs TGS's 0.90
- +29.1% vs TGS's +24.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.8% revenue growth vs WMB's 13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 31.6x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.6% margin vs WMB's 23.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs TGS's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMB's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.1% vs TGS's +24.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs WMB's 4.9%, ROIC 19.3% vs 7.7% |
TGS vs WMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TGS vs WMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.65T annually — 138.6x WMB's $11.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 24.6% (TGS) to 23.8% (WMB). On growth, TGS holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.65T | $11.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $885.1B | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406.7B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224.2B | $722M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +62.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TGS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, TGS trades at a 61% valuation discount to WMB's 34.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TGS offers better value at 0.08x vs WMB's 0.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $90.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $119.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.53x | 34.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 31.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.58x | 17.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.54x | 7.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.12x | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.35x | 89.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMB delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $15 for TGS. TGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMB's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGS scores 8/9 vs WMB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 1.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $868.6B | $29.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $803.8B | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.67T | $29.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.01x | 3.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGS five years ago would be worth $75,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33,202 for WMB. Over the past 12 months, WMB leads with a +29.1% total return vs TGS's +24.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGS at 39.8% vs WMB's 39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +22.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.9% | +29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.0% | +169.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +652.1% | +232.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +467.2% | +357.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +39.1% |
Risk & Volatility
WMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMB currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs TGS's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.35 | $77.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.74 | $55.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.3 | 66.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 341K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TGS and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TGS as "Buy" and WMB as "Buy". For income investors, TGS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.07% vs WMB's 2.71%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1788.78 | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TGS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMB leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
TGS vs WMB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGS or WMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the stronger pick with 64. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 8% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGS or WMB?
On trailing P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 5x. On forward P/E, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. wins at 0. 00x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. 's 0. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGS or WMB?
Over the past 5 years, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) delivered a total return of +652. 1%, compared to +232. 0% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGS returned +467. 2% versus WMB's +357. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGS or WMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. 's 0. 90β — meaning TGS is approximately 430% more volatile than WMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGS or WMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is pulling ahead at 64. 8% versus 13. 8% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. grew EPS 32. 2% year-over-year, compared to 17. 6% for The Williams Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGS leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGS or WMB?
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.
A. (TGS) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus 21. 9% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGS leads at 43. 3% versus 36. 8% for WMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGS leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGS or WMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. 's 0. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 31. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGS or WMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S. A. (TGS) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 7% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).
09Is TGS or WMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 2. 7% yield, +357. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMB: +357. 0%, TGS: +467. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGS and WMB?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.