Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MGRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Rental & Leasing Services
TH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MGRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $601.52B | $20.68B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $321M | $72M | $71M | $947M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $155M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.4x | — | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $8.76B | $32M | $528M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $295K |
TH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MGRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target Hospitality … (TH) | 100 | 999.4 | +899.4% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 698.1 | +598.1% |
| McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MGRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 0.87x
- Beta 0.79 vs SPIR's 2.93, lower leverage
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs MGRC's 394.1%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +181.8% vs MGRC's +6.6%
MGRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.7%
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- 16.4% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- 1.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SPIR's 2.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.8% vs MGRC's +6.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 10.5% vs -0.1% |
TH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MGRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MGRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGRC leads in 4 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • TH leads 1 • SPIR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $947M annually — 13.4x ASTS's $71M. MGRC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $321M | $72M | $71M | $947M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | -$74M | -$237M | $350M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$25.0B | -$342M | $155M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $196M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +16.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MGRC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 36% valuation discount to MGRC's 17.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGRC's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TH's 38.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $601.5B | $20.7B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $585.5B | $18.4B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.68x | 11.37x | -52.75x | 17.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 17.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 38.18x | — | — | 9.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.91x | 8406.65x | 291.65x | 2.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.04x | 5.18x | 6.15x | 2.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 223.42x | — | — | 13.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGRC delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGRC's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRC scores 6/9 vs ASTS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +12.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.8% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $528M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $295,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $8.8B | $32M | $528M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.09x | 9.20x | -21.20x | 8.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $90,848 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +181.8% total return vs MGRC's +6.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 141.0% vs TH's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +94.9% | +134.3% | -15.3% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +117.8% | +93.2% | +181.8% | +6.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +238.4% | +1299.6% | +31.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +502.7% | -76.9% | +808.5% | +49.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.3% | -75.9% | +623.4% | +394.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +50.1% | +141.0% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TH is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TH currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 54.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.12 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $128.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.97 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $94.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +77.6% | +54.4% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 48.9 | 34.1 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.6M | 14.7M | 211K |
Analyst Outlook
MGRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TH as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", MGRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs -8.2% for TH (target: $15). MGRC is the only dividend payer here at 1.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $17.25 | $103.65 | $140.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 12 | 7 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MGRC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns).
TH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs MGRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus McGrath RentCorp at 17. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +808. 5%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +623. 4% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Target Hospitality Corp.
(TH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 270% more volatile than TH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 43% for McGrath RentCorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -152. 9% for Target Hospitality Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRC leads at 25. 9% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 46.
6% to $103. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC?
In this comparison, MGRC (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TH, SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TH or SPIR or ASTS or MGRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 1. 7% yield, +394. 1% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGRC: +394. 1%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TH and SPIR and ASTS and MGRC?
These companies operate in different sectors (TH (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and MGRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGRC is a small-cap deep-value stock. MGRC pays a dividend while TH, SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.