Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
THM vs AEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
THM vs AEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $530M | $94.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $11.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $4.45B |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 52.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $321M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $2.87B |
THM vs AEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Tower… (THM) | 100 | 225.7 | +125.7% |
| Agnico Eagle Mines … (AEM) | 100 | 293.3 | +193.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THM vs AEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +192.0% vs AEM's +61.4%
AEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 134.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 351.2% 10Y total return vs THM's 323.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs THM's -10.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs THM's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs THM's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +192.0% vs AEM's +61.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.7% ROA vs THM's -8.1%, ROIC 21.9% vs -6.3% |
THM vs AEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
THM vs AEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEM and THM operate at a comparable scale, with $11.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $11.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $7.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$660,246 | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +52.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +37.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +199.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — THM and AEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $530M | $94.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $529M | $91.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -112.33x | 21.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.40x | 3.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEM delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-8 for THM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEM scores 8/9 vs THM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.1% | +13.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | +20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $321M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 73.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
THM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEM five years ago would be worth $28,328 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,897 for THM. Over the past 12 months, THM leads with a +192.0% total return vs AEM's +61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors THM at 68.1% vs AEM's 48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.9% | +10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +192.0% | +61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +374.6% | +224.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.0% | +183.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.5% | +351.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.1% | +48.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THM's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEM currently trades 73.5% from its 52-week high vs THM's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $255.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $103.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates THM as "Buy" and AEM as "Buy". AEM is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $237.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
AEM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). THM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
THM vs AEM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THM or AEM a better buy right now?
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) offers the better valuation at 21.
2x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (THM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — THM or AEM?
Over the past 5 years, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) delivered a total return of +183.
3%, compared to +129. 0% for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (THM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEM returned +351. 2% versus THM's +323. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — THM or AEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. 's 1. 47β — meaning THM is approximately 181% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — THM or AEM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited grew EPS 134.
4% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — THM or AEM?
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
5% net margin versus 0. 0% for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus 0. 0% for THM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — THM or AEM?
In this comparison, AEM (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. THM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is THM or AEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 0. 8% yield, +351. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +351. 2%, THM: +323. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between THM and AEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: THM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. AEM pays a dividend while THM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.