Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
THM vs HYMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
THM vs HYMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $530M | $3.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-77M |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $182M |
THM vs HYMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Tower… (THM) | 100 | 225.7 | +125.7% |
| Hycroft Mining Hold… (HYMC) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THM vs HYMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 323.5% 10Y total return vs HYMC's -59.5%
- -10.6% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
- 0.1% margin vs HYMC's -2.5%
HYMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.21
- EPS growth 64.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.6% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs HYMC's -2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs THM's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.5% vs THM's +192.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.1% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC -6.3% vs -90.1% |
THM vs HYMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
THM vs HYMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THM and HYMC operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$83M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$77M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$660,246 | -$105M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -14.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — THM and HYMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $530M | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $529M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -112.33x | -41.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.40x | 7.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
THM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
THM delivers a -8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-66 for HYMC.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | -65.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.1% | -33.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | -90.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | -22.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$182M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -9.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HYMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in THM five years ago would be worth $22,897 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,720 for HYMC. Over the past 12 months, HYMC leads with a +1046.9% total return vs THM's +192.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYMC at 111.3% vs THM's 68.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.9% | +59.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +192.0% | +1046.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +374.6% | +843.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.0% | -2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.5% | -59.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.1% | +111.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — THM and HYMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HYMC is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THM's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THM currently trades 69.9% from its 52-week high vs HYMC's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $58.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +66.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates THM as "Buy" and HYMC as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
THM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). HYMC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
THM vs HYMC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THM or HYMC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.
(THM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — THM or HYMC?
Over the past 5 years, International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.
(THM) delivered a total return of +129. 0%, compared to -2. 8% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: THM returned +323. 5% versus HYMC's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — THM or HYMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. 's 1. 47β — meaning THM is approximately 22% more volatile than HYMC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — THM or HYMC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation grew EPS 64.
3% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — THM or HYMC?
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.
(THM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: THM leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for HYMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — THM leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — THM or HYMC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is THM or HYMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.
(THM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+323. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (THM: +323. 5%, HYMC: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between THM and HYMC?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.