Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TIL vs ADCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
TIL vs ADCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $54M | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $79M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-47M | $-137M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -149.6% |
| Total Debt | $85M | $439M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $261M |
TIL vs ADCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instil Bio, Inc. (TIL) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| ADC Therapeutics S.… (ADCT) | 100 | 4.3 | -95.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TIL vs ADCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.55
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 74.8%, current ratio 39.53x
- Beta 1.55, current ratio 39.53x
ADCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.1%
- -96.5% 10Y total return vs TIL's -98.5%
- -71.4% vs TIL's -78.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.2% revenue growth vs ADCT's 14.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.0% margin vs ADCT's -173.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs ADCT's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -71.4% vs TIL's -78.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -22.4% ROA vs ADCT's -44.7% |
TIL vs ADCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TIL vs ADCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADCT and TIL operate at a comparable scale, with $79M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $79M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | -$117M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$47M | -$137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$115M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -149.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -173.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -144.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.6% | +41.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ADCT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $132M | $311M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.74x | -0.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TIL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADCT scores 4/9 vs TIL's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -39.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.4% | -44.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.3% | -43.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $79M | $178M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $261M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $85M | $439M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.24x | -1.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TIL and ADCT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADCT five years ago would be worth $453 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $239 for TIL. Over the past 12 months, ADCT leads with a -71.4% total return vs TIL's -78.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIL at -11.1% vs ADCT's -25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.7% | -70.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.9% | -71.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.8% | -58.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -95.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -96.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.1% | -25.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TIL and ADCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TIL is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADCT's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.50 | $4.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.67 | $0.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.6% | +21.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 14.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TIL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ADCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TIL vs ADCT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TIL or ADCT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate ADC Therapeutics S.
A. (ADCT) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TIL or ADCT?
Over the past 5 years, ADC Therapeutics S.
A. (ADCT) delivered a total return of -95. 5%, compared to -97. 6% for Instil Bio, Inc. (TIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADCT returned -96. 5% versus TIL's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TIL or ADCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Instil Bio, Inc.
(TIL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 55β versus ADC Therapeutics S. A. 's 1. 84β — meaning ADCT is approximately 18% more volatile than TIL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TIL or ADCT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ADC Therapeutics S.
A. grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to 6. 1% for Instil Bio, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TIL or ADCT?
Instil Bio, Inc.
(TIL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -175. 3% for ADC Therapeutics S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TIL leads at 0. 0% versus -133. 2% for ADCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADCT leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TIL or ADCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TIL or ADCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Instil Bio, Inc.
(TIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. ADC Therapeutics S. A. (ADCT) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TIL: -98. 5%, ADCT: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TIL and ADCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.