Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TILE vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
TILE vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.59B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.39B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $116M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $265M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $71M | $86.81B |
TILE vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interface, Inc. (TILE) | 100 | 324.5 | +224.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TILE vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TILE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 21.9%, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 1.00, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.34x
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs TILE's 74.9%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs TILE's 5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs TILE's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs TILE's 8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs TILE's +39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs TILE's 6.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs 11.3% |
TILE vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TILE vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 535.6x TILE's $1.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (AMZN) to 8.4% (TILE). On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $206M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $116M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.8% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TILE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, TILE trades at a 63% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TILE's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.06x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.10x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.68x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.10x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $10 for TILE. TILE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $193M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $71M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $265M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.00x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TILE and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TILE five years ago would be worth $19,935 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for AMZN. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs TILE's +39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TILE at 57.3% vs AMZN's 36.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.0% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.1% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +289.2% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.4% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.9% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.3% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TILE and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TILE is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs TILE's 78.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.11 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.74 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 572K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TILE as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for TILE (target: $36) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). TILE is the only dividend payer here at 0.22% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TILE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TILE vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TILE or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Interface, Inc. (TILE). Interface, Inc. (TILE) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interface, Inc. (TILE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TILE or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Interface, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TILE or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to +64. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus TILE's +74. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TILE or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 52% more volatile than TILE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interface, Inc. (TILE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TILE or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 5. 4% for Interface, Inc. (TILE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Interface, Inc. grew EPS 32. 4% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TILE or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 8. 4% for Interface, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TILE leads at 11. 8% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TILE or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TILE: 30. 7% to $36. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TILE or AMZN?
In this comparison, TILE (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TILE or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00)). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TILE: +74. 9%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TILE and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TILE is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.