Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TIVC vs GKOS vs NVCR vs HOLX vs ABT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TIVC
Tivic Health Systems, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.85B
5Y Perf.+233.9%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-83.8%
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.97B
5Y Perf.+1.2%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$151.30B
5Y Perf.-27.9%

TIVC vs GKOS vs NVCR vs HOLX vs ABT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TIVC logoTIVC
GKOS logoGKOS
NVCR logoNVCR
HOLX logoHOLX
ABT logoABT
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$3M$7.85B$1.92B$16.97B$151.30B
Revenue (TTM)$482K$551M$674M$4.13B$43.84B
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$-189M$-173M$544M$13.98B
Gross Margin-58.1%78.1%75.2%52.8%54.0%
Operating Margin-15.5%-15.6%-27.2%17.5%17.8%
Forward P/E17.2x15.9x
Total Debt$0.00$140M$290M$2.63B$15.28B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$91M$103M$1.96B$7.62B

TIVC vs GKOS vs NVCR vs HOLX vs ABTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TIVC
GKOS
NVCR
HOLX
ABT
StockNov 21May 26Return
Tivic Health System… (TIVC)1000.0-100.0%
Glaukos Corporation (GKOS)100333.9+233.9%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10016.2-83.8%
Hologic, Inc. (HOLX)100101.2+1.2%
Abbott Laboratories (ABT)10072.1-27.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TIVC vs GKOS vs NVCR vs HOLX vs ABT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABT leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Glaukos Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TIVC
Tivic Health Systems, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

TIVC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation
The Growth Play

GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.5%
  • 457.1% 10Y total return vs ABT's 173.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 21.3%, current ratio 4.69x
  • 32.3% revenue growth vs TIVC's -33.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

HOLX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
Best for: defensive
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
The Income Pick

ABT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.25, yield 2.5%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 31.9% margin vs TIVC's -15.6%
  • Beta 0.25 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGKOS logoGKOS32.3% revenue growth vs TIVC's -33.7%
ValueABT logoABTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsABT logoABT31.9% margin vs TIVC's -15.6%
Stability / SafetyABT logoABTBeta 0.25 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsABT logoABT2.5% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GKOS logoGKOS+52.0% vs TIVC's -76.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ABT logoABT16.6% ROA vs TIVC's -173.3%, ROIC 9.9% vs -7.8%

TIVC vs GKOS vs NVCR vs HOLX vs ABT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TIVCTivic Health Systems, Inc.
FY 2024
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$1,000
GKOSGlaukos Corporation
FY 2019
Glaucoma
97.5%$231M
Corneal Health
2.5%$6M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

HOLXHologic, Inc.
FY 2025
Diagnostics
44.6%$1.8B
Breast Health
36.2%$1.5B
Gyn Surgical
16.6%$680M
Skeletal Health
2.7%$109M
ABTAbbott Laboratories
FY 2024
Medical Devices
45.3%$19.0B
Diagnostic Products
22.3%$9.3B
Nutritional Products
20.1%$8.4B
Established Pharmaceutical Products
12.4%$5.2B

TIVC vs GKOS vs NVCR vs HOLX vs ABT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLABTLAGGINGHOLX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GKOS and ABT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

ABT is the larger business by revenue, generating $43.8B annually — 90960.6x TIVC's $482,000. ABT is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIVC's -15.6%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTIVC logoTIVCTivic Health Syst…GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$482,000$551M$674M$4.1B$43.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M-$40M-$165M$974M$10.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M-$189M-$173M$544M$14.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M-$18M-$48M$1000M$6.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-58.1%+78.1%+75.2%+52.8%+54.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.5%-15.6%-27.2%+17.5%+17.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-15.6%-34.3%-25.7%+13.2%+31.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.7%-3.4%-7.1%+24.2%+15.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.9%+41.2%+12.3%+2.5%+6.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.9%-6.3%-100.0%-9.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — GKOS and ABT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ABT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.4x trailing earnings, ABT trades at a 63% valuation discount to HOLX's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABT's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOLX's 17.4x.

MetricTIVC logoTIVCTivic Health Syst…GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
Market CapShares × price$3M$7.9B$1.9B$17.0B$151.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$599,551$7.9B$2.1B$17.6B$159.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.05x-40.90x-13.80x30.53x11.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.21x15.87x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.39x15.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.34x15.47x2.92x4.14x3.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share116.77x11.69x5.51x3.43x3.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.44x23.82x
ABT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ABT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABT delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-2 for TIVC. GKOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs GKOS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTIVC logoTIVCTivic Health Syst…GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.0%-26.5%-50.8%+11.0%+27.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-173.3%-20.1%-16.5%+6.1%+16.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.8%-9.2%-16.4%+9.4%+9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-180.0%-10.3%-28.9%+8.8%+10.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933577
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x0.85x0.52x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M$49M$187M$667M$7.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$91M$103M$2.0B$7.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$140M$290M$2.6B$15.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-18.69x-96.80x8.00x19.22x
ABT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for TIVC. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs TIVC's -76.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs TIVC's -83.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTIVC logoTIVCTivic Health Syst…GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-27.5%+21.2%+28.3%+1.9%-28.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-76.0%+52.0%+1.1%+37.1%-33.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+128.7%-75.7%-8.5%-15.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+61.5%-91.3%+15.8%-17.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+457.1%+30.3%+124.3%+173.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-83.3%+31.7%-37.6%-2.9%-5.4%
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HOLX and ABT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABT is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs TIVC's 18.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTIVC logoTIVCTivic Health Syst…GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.19x1.20x2.20x0.41x0.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.60$146.75$20.06$76.04$139.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.74$73.16$9.82$52.81$86.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+18.4%+91.4%+83.9%+100.0%+62.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.663.069.869.122.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded344K678K1.5M10.0M10.5M
Evenly matched — HOLX and ABT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold", ABT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). ABT is the only dividend payer here at 2.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTIVC logoTIVCTivic Health Syst…GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedHOLX logoHOLXHologic, Inc.ABT logoABTAbbott Laboratori…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$146.67$33.50$79.00$128.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts24154241
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.4%+0.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ABT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GKOS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallAbbott Laboratories (ABT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TIVC vs GKOS vs NVCR vs HOLX vs ABT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 7% for Tivic Health Systems, Inc. (TIVC). Abbott Laboratories (ABT) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT?

On trailing P/E, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the cheapest at 11.

4x versus Hologic, Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Abbott Laboratories is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT?

Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.

5%, compared to -100. 0% for Tivic Health Systems, Inc. (TIVC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +457. 1% versus TIVC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

25β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 788% more volatile than ABT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.

3% versus -33. 7% for Tivic Health Systems, Inc. (TIVC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abbott Laboratories grew EPS 133. 6% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GKOS leads at 21. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus -725. 0% for Tivic Health Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOLX leads at 17. 4% versus -725. 8% for TIVC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades at 15.

9x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Hologic, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT?

In this comparison, ABT (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. TIVC, GKOS, NVCR, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TIVC or GKOS or NVCR or HOLX or ABT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

25), 2. 5% yield, +173. 7% 10Y return). Tivic Health Systems, Inc. (TIVC) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABT: +173. 7%, TIVC: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TIVC and GKOS and NVCR and HOLX and ABT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TIVC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ABT pays a dividend while TIVC, GKOS, NVCR, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TIVC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GKOS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TIVC and GKOS and NVCR and HOLX and ABT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TIVC: 15.9% · GKOS: 41.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.