Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TK vs DHT vs FRO vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
TK vs DHT vs FRO vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.18B | $3.06B | $8.80B | $4.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $993M | $566M | $1.77B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $79M | $331M | $218M | $502M |
| Gross Margin | 28.1% | 47.5% | 26.5% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 50.1% | 25.5% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 64.0x | 6.5x | 6.1x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $66M | $429M | $3.75B | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $685M | $79M | $414M | $752M |
TK vs DHT vs FRO vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teekay Corporation (TK) | 100 | 480.9 | +380.9% |
| DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) | 100 | 319.9 | +219.9% |
| Frontline Ltd. (FRO) | 100 | 432.7 | +332.7% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 475.8 | +375.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TK vs DHT vs FRO vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 6.5%
- 6.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FRO's 4.9%
DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 58.6% margin vs TK's 7.9%
- 21.3% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 8.9% vs 19.1%
FRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs TK's 97.1%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 6.5x)
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- PEG 0.20 vs FRO's 0.26
- Beta 0.22, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.22 vs FRO's 0.37, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 6.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 58.6% margin vs TK's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs FRO's 0.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FRO's 4.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +141.2% vs DHT's +81.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.3% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 8.9% vs 19.1% |
TK vs DHT vs FRO vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TK vs DHT vs FRO vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories
DHT leads 1 • FRO leads 1 • STNG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 3.1x DHT's $566M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 58.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TK's 7.9%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +57.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $993M | $566M | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $334M | $388M | $781M | $580M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $79M | $331M | $218M | $502M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $241M | -$131M | $557M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +47.5% | +26.5% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +50.1% | +25.5% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +58.6% | +12.3% | +48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | -23.1% | +31.5% | +37.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.0% | +57.3% | -11.8% | +46.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | +2.8% | -33.3% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 44% valuation discount to FRO's 17.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNG offers better value at 0.36x vs FRO's 0.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $3.1B | $8.8B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $565M | $3.4B | $12.1B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.92x | 14.50x | 17.72x | 12.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 64.05x | 6.49x | 6.05x | 6.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.76x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.23x | 12.34x | 10.82x | 8.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 6.15x | 4.29x | 4.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 2.70x | 3.76x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.02x | — | — | 8.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $4 for TK. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs FRO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | +29.1% | +9.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +21.3% | +3.8% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.1% | +8.9% | +10.6% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.1% | +11.7% | +14.1% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.38x | 1.60x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$620M | $350M | $3.3B | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $685M | $79M | $414M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $66M | $429M | $3.7B | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 69.29x | 25.61x | 1.87x | 6.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FRO five years ago would be worth $57,761 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,660 for DHT. Over the past 12 months, FRO leads with a +141.2% total return vs DHT's +81.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 51.1% vs STNG's 24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.8% | +65.3% | +97.0% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +98.0% | +81.1% | +141.2% | +111.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +244.7% | +167.6% | +213.2% | +92.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +412.3% | +286.6% | +477.6% | +350.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | +318.2% | +531.6% | +62.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.1% | +38.8% | +46.3% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRO and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRO's 0.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRO currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 92.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.28x | 0.37x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.35 | $20.55 | $39.89 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.12 | $10.61 | $16.25 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +92.5% | +99.0% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 59.5 | 63.1 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 508K | 4.6M | 3.9M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TK as "Buy", DHT as "Buy", FRO as "Hold", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.3% upside for STNG (target: $86) vs -5.3% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.47% vs STNG's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $38.50 | $86.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 16 | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.5% | +3.9% | +4.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $0.74 | $1.95 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DHT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
TK vs DHT vs FRO vs STNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TK or DHT or FRO or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (64. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Corporation (TK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TK or DHT or FRO or STNG?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.
9x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Scorpio Tankers Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TK or DHT or FRO or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) delivered a total return of +477. 6%, compared to +286. 6% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRO returned +531. 6% versus STNG's +62. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TK or DHT or FRO or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 37β — meaning FRO is approximately 65% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TK or DHT or FRO or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TK or DHT or FRO or STNG?
DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 11. 0% for Teekay Corporation — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 29. 9% for TK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TK or DHT or FRO or STNG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 64. 0x for Teekay Corporation — 58. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STNG: 2. 3% to $86. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — TK or DHT or FRO or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is TK or DHT or FRO or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 4. 9% yield, +531. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRO: +531. 6%, TK: +97. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TK and DHT and FRO and STNG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.