Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TK vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
TK vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $993M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $79M | $-410M |
| Gross Margin | 28.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | 61.9x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $66M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $685M | $98M |
TK vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teekay Corporation (TK) | 100 | 423.0 | +323.0% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 138.4 | +38.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TK vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.7%
- 87.8% 10Y total return vs SOC's 38.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 6.99x
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 40.6%
- 35.6% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 61.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.6% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 61.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs SOC's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.7% vs SOC's -32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs SOC's -24.4%, ROIC 19.1% vs -44.6% |
TK vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TK vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TK and SOC operate at a comparable scale, with $993M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $993M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $334M | -$395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $79M | -$410M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $241M | -$640M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -138.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SOC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $525M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.59x | -3.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 61.91x | 7.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.14x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 2464.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TK leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TK delivers a 4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-102 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TK scores 6/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | -102.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | -24.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.1% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.1% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$620M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $685M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $66M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 69.29x | -3.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TK five years ago would be worth $52,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,825 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, TK leads with a +87.7% total return vs SOC's -32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 49.8% vs SOC's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.4% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.7% | -32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.9% | +32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +422.5% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.8% | +38.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.8% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TK is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TK currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 38.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.22 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.12 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +38.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 518K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TK as "Buy" and SOC as "Buy". TK is the only dividend payer here at 6.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.2% | 0.0% |
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SOC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
TK vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TK or SOC a better buy right now?
Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9.
6x trailing P/E (61. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Corporation (TK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TK or SOC?
On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp.
is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TK or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +422.
5%, compared to +38. 2% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TK returned +87. 8% versus SOC's +38. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TK or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Corporation (TK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 299% more volatile than TK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — TK or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -7. 8% for Teekay Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TK or SOC?
Teekay Corporation (TK) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TK leads at 29. 9% versus 0. 0% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TK leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TK or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 61. 9x for Teekay Corporation — 54. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TK or SOC?
In this comparison, TK (6.
7% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TK or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 6. 7% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TK: +87. 8%, SOC: +38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TK and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TK pays a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.