TLIH vs BTBT vs MARA vs CLPS

For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 7% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) delivered a total return of -42. 9%, compared to -89. 9% for Ten-League International Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (TLIH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -56. 3% versus TLIH's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

15β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 77β — meaning BTBT is approximately 2438% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 186% for Ten-League International Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -30. 7% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ten-League International Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares grew EPS -100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ten-League International Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (TLIH) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TLIH leads at 10. 2% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TLIH leads at 24. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

7% yield) pays a dividend. TLIH, BTBT, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

15), 14. 7% yield). Ten-League International Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (TLIH) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, TLIH: -89. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TLIH (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TLIH is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while TLIH, BTBT, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.