Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TNGX vs AZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
TNGX vs AZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $3.21B | $286.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $60.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-102M | $10.39B |
| Gross Margin | 97.3% | 81.7% |
| Operating Margin | -178.4% | 23.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $34M | $29.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $112M | $5.71B |
TNGX vs AZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tango Therapeutics,… (TNGX) | 100 | 228.0 | +128.0% |
| AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) | 100 | 168.2 | +68.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNGX vs AZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNGX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 48.3%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 16.32x
- 48.3% revenue growth vs AZN's 8.6%
AZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.8%
- 290.3% 10Y total return vs TNGX's 130.9%
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.94x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.3% revenue growth vs AZN's 8.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs TNGX's -162.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs TNGX's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs AZN's +35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs TNGX's -36.3%, ROIC 14.9% vs -38.5% |
TNGX vs AZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TNGX vs AZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.4B annually — 968.8x TNGX's $62M. AZN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TNGX's -162.9%. On growth, AZN holds the edge at +12.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $60.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $20.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$102M | $10.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$140M | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.3% | +81.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -178.4% | +23.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -162.9% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +15.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +12.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AZN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $286.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $310.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.15x | 28.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 51.47x | 4.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.93x | 5.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AZN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AZN delivers a 22.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-50 for TNGX. TNGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AZN's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AZN scores 8/9 vs TNGX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.3% | +22.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -36.3% | +9.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.5% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | +17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$79M | $24.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $112M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $29.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 8.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNGX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNGX five years ago would be worth $20,539 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,698 for AZN. Over the past 12 months, TNGX leads with a +1774.6% total return vs AZN's +35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNGX at 90.1% vs AZN's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +164.5% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1774.6% | +35.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +586.6% | +32.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.4% | +87.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.9% | +290.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +90.1% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AZN is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNGX's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AZN currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs TNGX's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.41 | $212.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $91.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 31.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TNGX as "Buy" and AZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.1% upside for AZN (target: $211) vs -3.7% for TNGX (target: $23). AZN is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.75 | $211.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
AZN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TNGX leads in 1 (Total Returns).
TNGX vs AZN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNGX or AZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is the stronger pick with 48. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN). AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) offers the better valuation at 28. 3x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TNGX or AZN?
Over the past 5 years, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) delivered a total return of +105. 4%, compared to +87. 0% for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AZN returned +290. 3% versus TNGX's +130. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TNGX or AZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Tango Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning TNGX is approximately 170% more volatile than AZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 61% for AstraZeneca PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TNGX or AZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is pulling ahead at 48. 3% versus 8. 6% for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AstraZeneca PLC grew EPS 190. 7% year-over-year, compared to 26. 9% for Tango Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNGX leads at 35. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TNGX or AZN?
AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
5% net margin versus -162. 9% for Tango Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AZN leads at 23. 4% versus -178. 4% for TNGX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNGX leads at 96. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TNGX or AZN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AZN: 14.
1% to $211. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TNGX or AZN?
In this comparison, AZN (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. TNGX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TNGX or AZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 8% yield, +290. 3% 10Y return). Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AZN: +290. 3%, TNGX: +130. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TNGX and AZN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TNGX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AZN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. AZN pays a dividend while TNGX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.