Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.76B | $8.39B | $4.24B | $3.05B | $4.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $952M | $1.77B | $843M | $498M | $938M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $351M | $218M | $309M | $211M | $344M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 26.5% | 47.2% | 38.3% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | 27.5% | 25.5% | 42.4% | 45.1% | 33.0% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | 5.9x | 8.1x | 7.0x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $3.75B | $576M | $429M | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $831M | $414M | $117M | $79M | $752M |
TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 456.7 | +356.7% |
| Frontline Ltd. (FRO) | 100 | 412.9 | +312.9% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 378.2 | +278.2% |
| DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) | 100 | 318.9 | +218.9% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 465.4 | +365.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TNK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs FRO's 0.25
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 7.0x)
- 15.7% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 10.6%
FRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 5.2%
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- 5.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.1%
- +146.7% vs TNK's +76.4%
DHT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.27, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.80x
- 42.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
- Beta 0.27 vs INSW's 0.43
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 7.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs INSW's 0.43 | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +146.7% vs TNK's +76.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 10.6% |
TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories
INSW leads 1 • FRO leads 1 • DHT leads 0 • STNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 3.5x DHT's $498M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 42.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, INSW holds the edge at +37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $952M | $1.8B | $843M | $498M | $938M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $348M | $781M | $521M | $331M | $490M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $351M | $218M | $309M | $211M | $344M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $113M | $557M | $38M | -$33M | $428M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +26.5% | +47.2% | +38.3% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +25.5% | +42.4% | +45.1% | +33.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +12.3% | +36.7% | +42.4% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +31.5% | +4.5% | -6.7% | +45.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.4% | -11.8% | +37.6% | +9.5% | +23.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.0% | -33.3% | +2.6% | +20.6% | +81.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 54% valuation discount to FRO's 16.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.25x vs FRO's 0.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $8.4B | $4.2B | $3.1B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $11.7B | $4.7B | $3.4B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.86x | 16.91x | 13.77x | 14.46x | 11.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.86x | 5.93x | 8.10x | 6.99x | 8.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.25x | 0.72x | — | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.58x | 10.46x | 10.00x | 12.31x | 8.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.90x | 4.09x | 5.03x | 6.13x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 3.59x | 2.11x | 2.69x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.50x | — | 111.18x | — | 8.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHT delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRO. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.2% | +9.4% | +16.0% | +19.3% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.7% | +3.8% | +11.8% | +14.3% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +10.6% | +9.4% | +8.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +14.1% | +12.1% | +11.7% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.60x | 0.29x | 0.38x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$776M | $3.3B | $459M | $350M | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $831M | $414M | $117M | $79M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $3.7B | $576M | $429M | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.95x | 1.87x | 3.69x | 15.92x | 4.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,557 for DHT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +146.7% total return vs TNK's +76.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 44.3% vs STNG's 23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.6% | +88.2% | +87.1% | +64.8% | +67.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.4% | +124.6% | +146.7% | +77.4% | +107.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.4% | +200.6% | +167.9% | +166.9% | +88.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +513.9% | +471.4% | +422.1% | +285.6% | +388.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | +506.8% | +970.0% | +334.7% | +61.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +44.3% | +38.9% | +38.7% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSW and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.36x | 0.43x | 0.27x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.54 | $39.89 | $88.52 | $20.55 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.05 | $16.25 | $35.60 | $10.61 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +94.5% | +96.9% | +92.2% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 64.2 | 75.1 | 61.1 | 73.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 547K | 4.0M | 585K | 4.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FRO and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TNK as "Buy", FRO as "Hold", INSW as "Buy", DHT as "Buy", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -5.0% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, FRO offers the higher dividend yield at 5.17% vs STNG's 2.04%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $38.50 | $83.33 | $18.00 | $85.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 22 | 13 | 16 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +5.2% | +3.4% | +3.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.98 | $1.95 | $2.92 | $0.74 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INSW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Frontline Ltd. at 16. 9x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 9%, compared to +285. 6% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +970. 0% versus STNG's +61. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 58% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?
DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 4x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 13. 4% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Frontline Ltd. (FRO) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 4% yield, +970. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +970. 0%, STNG: +61. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNK and FRO and INSW and DHT and STNG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.