Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.76B
5Y Perf.+356.7%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$8.39B
5Y Perf.+312.9%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.+278.2%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+218.9%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.27B
5Y Perf.+365.4%

TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TNK logoTNK
FRO logoFRO
INSW logoINSW
DHT logoDHT
STNG logoSTNG
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2.76B$8.39B$4.24B$3.05B$4.27B
Revenue (TTM)$952M$1.77B$843M$498M$938M
Net Income (TTM)$351M$218M$309M$211M$344M
Gross Margin27.5%26.5%47.2%38.3%46.2%
Operating Margin27.5%25.5%42.4%45.1%33.0%
Forward P/E5.9x5.9x8.1x7.0x8.4x
Total Debt$55M$3.75B$576M$429M$619M
Cash & Equiv.$831M$414M$117M$79M$752M

TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TNK
FRO
INSW
DHT
STNG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100456.7+356.7%
Frontline Ltd. (FRO)100412.9+312.9%
International Seawa… (INSW)100378.2+278.2%
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT)100318.9+218.9%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100465.4+365.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TNK and FRO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Frontline Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. DHT and INSW also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Value Pick

TNK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs FRO's 0.25
  • Lower P/E (5.9x vs 7.0x)
  • 15.7% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 10.6%
Best for: valuation efficiency
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
The Income Pick

FRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 5.2%
  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
  • 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
  • 5.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 9.7% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.1%
  • +146.7% vs TNK's +76.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

DHT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 0.27, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.80x
  • 42.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
  • Beta 0.27 vs INSW's 0.43
Best for: defensive
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRO logoFRO13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (5.9x vs 7.0x)
Quality / MarginsDHT logoDHT42.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
Stability / SafetyDHT logoDHTBeta 0.27 vs INSW's 0.43
DividendsFRO logoFRO5.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+146.7% vs TNK's +76.4%
Efficiency (ROA)TNK logoTNK15.7% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 10.6%

TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
59.3%$1.1B
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.4%$547M
Other revenue
7.6%$136M
Time-charter
1.4%$26M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.7%$13M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
0.6%$11M
FROFrontline Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage Charter
95.3%$2.0B
Time Charter
4.1%$85M
Administrative Income
0.5%$10M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Voyage Charter Revenues
70.7%$351M
Time Charter Revenues
29.3%$146M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTNKLAGGINGSTNG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 3.5x DHT's $498M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 42.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, INSW holds the edge at +37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$952M$1.8B$843M$498M$938M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$348M$781M$521M$331M$490M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$351M$218M$309M$211M$344M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$113M$557M$38M-$33M$428M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.5%+26.5%+47.2%+38.3%+46.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.5%+25.5%+42.4%+45.1%+33.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+36.9%+12.3%+36.7%+42.4%+36.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.8%+31.5%+4.5%-6.7%+45.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-26.4%-11.8%+37.6%+9.5%+23.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+46.0%-33.3%+2.6%+20.6%+81.1%
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 7.9x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 54% valuation discount to FRO's 16.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.25x vs FRO's 0.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Market CapShares × price$2.8B$8.4B$4.2B$3.1B$4.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.0B$11.7B$4.7B$3.4B$4.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.86x16.91x13.77x14.46x11.74x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.86x5.93x8.10x6.99x8.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.25x0.72x0.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.58x10.46x10.00x12.31x8.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.90x4.09x5.03x6.13x4.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.35x3.59x2.11x2.69x1.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.50x111.18x8.70x
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DHT delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRO. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.2%+9.4%+16.0%+19.3%+11.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.7%+3.8%+11.8%+14.3%+8.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.5%+10.6%+9.4%+8.9%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.9%+14.1%+12.1%+11.7%+8.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945676
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x1.60x0.29x0.38x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$776M$3.3B$459M$350M-$133M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$831M$414M$117M$79M$752M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$55M$3.7B$576M$429M$619M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense109.95x1.87x3.69x15.92x4.21x
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FRO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,557 for DHT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +146.7% total return vs TNK's +76.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 44.3% vs STNG's 23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+54.6%+88.2%+87.1%+64.8%+67.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+76.4%+124.6%+146.7%+77.4%+107.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+131.4%+200.6%+167.9%+166.9%+88.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+513.9%+471.4%+422.1%+285.6%+388.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+200.7%+506.8%+970.0%+334.7%+61.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.3%+44.3%+38.9%+38.7%+23.4%
FRO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INSW and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x0.36x0.43x0.27x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$83.54$39.89$88.52$20.55$87.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.05$16.25$35.60$10.61$37.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.0%+94.5%+96.9%+92.2%+94.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.164.275.161.173.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded547K4.0M585K4.7M1.2M
Evenly matched — INSW and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FRO and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TNK as "Buy", FRO as "Hold", INSW as "Buy", DHT as "Buy", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -5.0% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, FRO offers the higher dividend yield at 5.17% vs STNG's 2.04%.

MetricTNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$90.00$38.50$83.33$18.00$85.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts2322131631
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+5.2%+3.4%+3.9%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.98$1.95$2.92$0.74$1.69
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0%
Evenly matched — FRO and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TNK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INSW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallTeekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TNK vs FRO vs INSW vs DHT vs STNG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Frontline Ltd. at 16. 9x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 9%, compared to +285. 6% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +970. 0% versus STNG's +61. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 58% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?

DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 4x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 13. 4% to $90. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Frontline Ltd. (FRO) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

09

Is TNK or FRO or INSW or DHT or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 4% yield, +970. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +970. 0%, STNG: +61. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TNK and FRO and INSW and DHT and STNG?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TNK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FRO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSW

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DHT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STNG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TNK and FRO and INSW and DHT and STNG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TNK: -26.4% · FRO: -11.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(TNK: 36.9% · FRO: 12.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TNK: 7.9x · FRO: 16.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.