Medical - Care Facilities
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TOI vs AIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
TOI vs AIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $5.41B | $574M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $546M | $436M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-32M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 1.7% |
| Total Debt | $104M | $287M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $49M |
TOI vs AIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Oncology Instit… (TOI) | 100 | 1154.3 | +1054.3% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 92.3 | -7.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOI vs AIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.95
- Lower volatility, beta 1.95, current ratio 1.59x
- Beta 1.95, current ratio 1.59x
AIOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- -11.5% 10Y total return vs TOI's -45.3%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs TOI's 27.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs TOI's 27.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.4% margin vs TOI's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.95 vs AIOT's 2.71 | |
| Dividends | 17.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.4% vs AIOT's -11.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.4% ROA vs TOI's -26.5%, ROIC -4.3% vs -41.2% |
TOI vs AIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOI vs AIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOI and AIOT operate at a comparable scale, with $546M and $436M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.4% (AIOT) to -8.0% (TOI). On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $546M | $436M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $69M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | -7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +47.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.5% | -25.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TOI and AIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $574M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $813M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.83x | -9.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 51.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.75x | 1.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AIOT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOI scores 4/9 vs AIOT's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.5% | -3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.2% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | -5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | $238M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $287M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.96x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIOT five years ago would be worth $8,847 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,257 for TOI. Over the past 12 months, TOI leads with a +100.4% total return vs AIOT's -11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOI at 111.1% vs AIOT's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.7% | -19.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.4% | -11.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +841.3% | -11.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.4% | -11.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | -11.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +111.1% | -4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TOI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TOI is the less volatile stock with a 1.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TOI currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs AIOT's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 2.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.58 | $5.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.02 | $2.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 65.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TOI as "Buy" and AIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.6% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 50.7% for TOI (target: $8). AIOT is the only dividend payer here at 17.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
AIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TOI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
TOI vs AIOT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOI or AIOT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate The Oncology Institute, Inc.
(TOI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TOI or AIOT?
Over the past 5 years, PowerFleet, Inc.
(AIOT) delivered a total return of -11. 5%, compared to -47. 4% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIOT returned -11. 5% versus TOI's -45. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TOI or AIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Oncology Institute, Inc.
(TOI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 95β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 71β — meaning AIOT is approximately 39% more volatile than TOI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TOI or AIOT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PowerFleet, Inc.
grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to 23. 9% for The Oncology Institute, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TOI or AIOT?
The Oncology Institute, Inc.
(TOI) is the more profitable company, earning -12. 1% net margin versus -14. 1% for PowerFleet, Inc. — meaning it keeps -12. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIOT leads at -7. 1% versus -7. 2% for TOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIOT leads at 53. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TOI or AIOT?
In this comparison, AIOT (17.
8% yield) pays a dividend. TOI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TOI or AIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PowerFleet, Inc.
(AIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (17. 8% yield). The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIOT: -11. 5%, TOI: -45. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TOI and AIOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOI (Healthcare) and AIOT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. AIOT pays a dividend while TOI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.