Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
TOI logo
TOI
ONCO logo
ONCO
CRVS logo
CRVS
AIOT logo
AIOT
IMVT logo
IMVT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TOI vs ONCO vs CRVS vs AIOT vs IMVT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TOI
The Oncology Institute, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.41B
5Y Perf.+1054.3%
ONCO
Onconetix, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$654K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
CRVS
Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.00B
5Y Perf.+555.5%
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$574M
5Y Perf.-7.7%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+27.3%

TOI vs ONCO vs CRVS vs AIOT vs IMVT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TOI logoTOI
ONCO logoONCO
CRVS logoCRVS
AIOT logoAIOT
IMVT logoIMVT
IndustryMedical - Care FacilitiesBiotechnologyBiotechnologyCommunication EquipmentBiotechnology
Market Cap$5.41B$654K$1.00B$574M$6.90B
Revenue (TTM)$546M$735K$0.00$436M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$-10M$-44M$-32M$-506M
Gross Margin14.8%79.6%55.2%
Operating Margin-6.0%-9.2%1.7%
Total Debt$104M$49K$937K$287M$72K
Cash & Equiv.$34M$5M$5M$49M$902M

TOI vs ONCO vs CRVS vs AIOT vs IMVTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TOI
ONCO
CRVS
AIOT
IMVT
StockJun 24Jun 26Return
The Oncology Instit… (TOI)1001154.3+1054.3%
Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO)1000.0-100.0%
Corvus Pharmaceutic… (CRVS)100655.5+555.5%
PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT)10092.3-7.7%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100127.3+27.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TOI vs ONCO vs CRVS vs AIOT vs IMVT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AIOT leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. ONCO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇AIOT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
TOI
The Oncology Institute, Inc.
The Growth Angle

TOI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ONCO
Onconetix, Inc.
The Income Pick

ONCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.33
  • Beta 1.33 vs AIOT's 2.71, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
CRVS
Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

CRVS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.

  • 3.5% margin vs ONCO's -13.2%
  • +181.4% vs ONCO's -99.7%
Best for: quality and momentum
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.
The Growth Play

AIOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
  • 66.3% revenue growth vs ONCO's -67.7%
  • 17.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • -3.4% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
Best for: growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs CRVS's -6.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 9.09x
  • Beta 1.66, current ratio 9.09x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAIOT logoAIOT66.3% revenue growth vs ONCO's -67.7%
Quality / MarginsCRVS logoCRVS3.5% margin vs ONCO's -13.2%
Stability / SafetyONCO logoONCOBeta 1.33 vs AIOT's 2.71, lower leverage
DividendsAIOT logoAIOT17.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CRVS logoCRVS+181.4% vs ONCO's -99.7%
Efficiency (ROA)AIOT logoAIOT-3.4% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

TOI vs ONCO vs CRVS vs AIOT vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TOIThe Oncology Institute, Inc.
FY 2025
Health Care, Patient Service
49.5%$229M
Fee For Service
32.1%$149M
Capitated Revenue
17.4%$80M
Clinical Research Trials And Other Revenue
1.0%$5M
ONCOOnconetix, Inc.
FY 2025
License
0.0%$0
CRVSCorvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AIOTPowerFleet, Inc.
FY 2024
Service
62.8%$84M
Product
37.2%$50M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TOI vs ONCO vs CRVS vs AIOT vs IMVT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAIOTLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AIOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TOI and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $546M and $0 in trailing revenue. AIOT is the more profitable business, keeping -7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ONCO's -13.2%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTOI logoTOIThe Oncology Inst…ONCO logoONCOOnconetix, Inc.CRVS logoCRVSCorvus Pharmaceut…AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$546M$735,198$0$436M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$26M-$7M-$48M$69M-$532M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M-$10M-$44M-$32M-$506M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$26M-$10M-$35M$3M-$407M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+14.8%+79.6%+55.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.0%-9.2%+1.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.0%-13.2%-7.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.7%-13.3%+0.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+41.2%-78.9%+47.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+90.5%+98.7%-15.4%-25.5%-14.1%
AIOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ONCO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricTOI logoTOIThe Oncology Inst…ONCO logoONCOOnconetix, Inc.CRVS logoCRVSCorvus Pharmaceut…AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5.4B$653,669$1.0B$574M$6.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.5B-$5M$1000M$813M$6.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.83x-0.22x-22.51x-9.81x-12.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple51.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue10.75x0.80x1.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.22x15.54x1.13x7.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
ONCO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AIOT delivers a -6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-105 for ONCO. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONCO scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTOI logoTOIThe Oncology Inst…ONCO logoONCOOnconetix, Inc.CRVS logoCRVSCorvus Pharmaceut…AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-105.5%-38.9%-6.6%-68.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-26.5%-49.4%-35.7%-3.4%-62.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-41.2%-32.8%-78.1%-4.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-33.7%-49.4%-90.2%-5.1%-68.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945332
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.02x0.64x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$70M-$5M-$4M$238M-$902M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$34M$5M$5M$49M$902M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$104M$48,774$937,000$287M$72,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.96x-17.32x-26.63x0.47x
AIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CRVS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CRVS five years ago would be worth $42,156 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ONCO. Over the past 12 months, CRVS leads with a +181.4% total return vs ONCO's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOI at 111.1% vs ONCO's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTOI logoTOIThe Oncology Inst…ONCO logoONCOOnconetix, Inc.CRVS logoCRVSCorvus Pharmaceut…AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+44.7%-98.7%+63.0%-19.6%+29.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+100.4%-99.7%+181.4%-11.0%+110.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+841.3%-100.0%+255.1%-11.5%+55.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.4%-100.0%+321.6%-11.5%+213.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.3%-100.0%-6.1%-11.5%+237.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+111.1%-98.0%+52.6%-4.0%+15.7%
CRVS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TOI and ONCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ONCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TOI currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs ONCO's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTOI logoTOIThe Oncology Inst…ONCO logoONCOOnconetix, Inc.CRVS logoCRVSCorvus Pharmaceut…AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.95x1.33x2.02x2.71x1.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.58$361.50$26.95$5.88$36.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.02$0.91$3.55$2.77$14.32
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.2%+0.3%+44.3%+71.8%+92.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.325.139.165.957.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M1.4M1.4M1.5M1.9M
Evenly matched — TOI and ONCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TOI as "Buy", CRVS as "Buy", AIOT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 178.0% upside for CRVS (target: $33) vs 29.9% for IMVT (target: $44). AIOT is the only dividend payer here at 17.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTOI logoTOIThe Oncology Inst…ONCO logoONCOOnconetix, Inc.CRVS logoCRVSCorvus Pharmaceut…AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$33.17$8.00$43.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts513523
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+17.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.75
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.5%0.0%
AIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AIOT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ONCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallPowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TOI vs ONCO vs CRVS vs AIOT vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TOI or ONCO or CRVS or AIOT or IMVT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Oncology Institute, Inc.

(TOI) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 7% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). Analysts rate The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — TOI or ONCO or CRVS or AIOT or IMVT?

Over the past 5 years, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(CRVS) delivered a total return of +321. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus ONCO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — TOI or ONCO or CRVS or AIOT or IMVT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Onconetix, Inc.

(ONCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 71β — meaning AIOT is approximately 104% more volatile than ONCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 64% for PowerFleet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — TOI or ONCO or CRVS or AIOT or IMVT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Oncology Institute, Inc.

(TOI) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus -67. 7% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Onconetix, Inc. grew EPS 99. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — TOI or ONCO or CRVS or AIOT or IMVT?

Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(CRVS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1721. 0% for Onconetix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRVS leads at 0. 0% versus -778. 2% for ONCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONCO leads at 77. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — TOI or ONCO or CRVS or AIOT or IMVT?

In this comparison, AIOT (17.

8% yield) pays a dividend. TOI, ONCO, CRVS, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is TOI or ONCO or CRVS or AIOT or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Onconetix, Inc.

(ONCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONCO: -100. 0%, CRVS: -6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between TOI and ONCO and CRVS and AIOT and IMVT?

These companies operate in different sectors (TOI (Healthcare) and ONCO (Healthcare) and CRVS (Healthcare) and AIOT (Technology) and IMVT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TOI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ONCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT pays a dividend while TOI, ONCO, CRVS, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.