Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Medical - Devices
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Software - Application | Medical - Devices | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $184M | $60.05B | $311M | $589M | $11.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $895K | $490M | $37M | $164M | $15M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $76M | $-12.36B | $48M | $137M | $-312M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 68.1% | 90.8% | 61.9% | -6.1% |
| Operating Margin | -13.0% | 94.2% | -94.7% | 16.8% | -21.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.4x | 4.0x | 9.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $464K | $8.28B | $70K | $14M | $429M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $2.30B | $9M | $95M | $45M |
TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TON Strategy Co. (TONX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 1444.5 | +1344.5% |
| Semler Scientific, … (SMLR) | 100 | 36.2 | -63.8% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 191.6 | +91.6% |
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | 100 | 1606.0 | +1506.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TONX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.2%, EPS growth 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 3.84x
- NIM 4.5% vs BTBT's 0.1%
- 13.2% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7%
MSTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.59, yield 0.7%
- Beta 2.59, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
- Better valuation composite
- 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SMLR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 11.1% 10Y total return vs MSTR's 8.6%
- 130.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Among these 5 stocks, BTBT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HUT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.0% vs MSTR's -54.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.2% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 130.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.81 vs HUT's 4.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.0% vs MSTR's -54.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -79.4% vs -9.9% |
TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
HUT leads 1 • TONX leads 0 • SMLR leads 0 • BTBT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $490M annually — 548.0x TONX's $895,000. SMLR is the more profitable business, keeping 130.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%. On growth, MSTR holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $895,000 | $490M | $37M | $164M | $15M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $480M | -$35M | $166M | -$389M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $76M | -$12.4B | $48M | $137M | -$312M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $7.6B | -$389M | -$448M | -$892M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +68.1% | +90.8% | +61.9% | -6.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +94.2% | -94.7% | +16.8% | -21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -25.2% | +130.8% | +17.3% | -15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | +15.5% | -10.5% | -65.3% | -22.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.9% | -44.6% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +158.4% | -132.0% | +48.6% | +2.8% | -52.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TONX and BTBT each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.0x trailing earnings, SMLR trades at a 57% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMLR's 14.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $184M | $60.1B | $311M | $589M | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $177M | $66.0B | $302M | $508M | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -186.78x | -11.81x | 3.96x | 9.15x | -47.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.37x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.18x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.04x | 8.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 205.28x | 125.83x | 5.52x | 3.60x | 743.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.12x | 1.04x | 0.70x | 0.56x | 6.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TONX and SMLR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TONX delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MSTR. SMLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUT's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TONX scores 6/9 vs HUT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.2% | -24.1% | +10.5% | +21.4% | -17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.1% | -19.4% | +8.1% | +19.0% | -11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -79.4% | -9.9% | +13.3% | +6.5% | -13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -116.5% | -12.6% | +13.7% | +8.5% | -17.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.16x | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $6.0B | -$9M | -$81M | $384M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $2.3B | $9M | $95M | $45M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $464,000 | $8.3B | $70,000 | $14M | $429M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 45245.50x | 9.05x | -12.85x | — | -9.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUT five years ago would be worth $39,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for TONX. Over the past 12 months, HUT leads with a +699.2% total return vs MSTR's -54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUT at 124.4% vs TONX's -78.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.9% | +14.4% | +14.3% | -10.3% | +97.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.9% | -54.2% | -38.5% | -9.0% | +699.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +510.2% | -18.9% | -19.7% | +1030.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +189.8% | -81.8% | -84.6% | +296.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +855.6% | +1110.1% | -60.4% | +462.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.7% | +82.7% | -6.8% | -7.1% | +124.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TONX and HUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TONX is the less volatile stock with a 1.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUT's 4.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUT currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs TONX's 10.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 2.59x | 2.48x | 3.37x | 4.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.77 | $457.22 | $50.44 | $4.55 | $111.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.75 | $104.17 | $14.88 | $1.25 | $12.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.9% | +39.3% | +40.3% | +40.2% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 68.8 | 52.4 | 69.1 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 408K | 18.8M | 0 | 18.5M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TONX as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", SMLR as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", HUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -22.4% for HUT (target: $79). For income investors, MSTR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs BTBT's 0.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $280.83 | $50.50 | $5.00 | $78.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 29 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.30 | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). HUT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TON Strategy Co.
(TONX) is the stronger pick with 1321% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TON Strategy Co. (TONX) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?
On trailing P/E, Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the cheapest at 4. 0x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?
Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.
(HUT) delivered a total return of +296. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for TON Strategy Co. (TONX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMLR returned +1110% versus TONX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TON Strategy Co.
(TONX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 81β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 149% more volatile than TONX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Hut 8 Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TON Strategy Co.
(TONX) is pulling ahead at 1321% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -162. 9% for Hut 8 Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMLR leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?
Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 7% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMLR leads at 37. 2% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMLR leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.
2% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?
In this comparison, MSTR (0.
7% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TONX, SMLR, HUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TONX and MSTR and SMLR and BTBT and HUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TONX (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and SMLR (Healthcare) and BTBT (Financial Services) and HUT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TONX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SMLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSTR pays a dividend while TONX, SMLR, BTBT, HUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.