Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TONX
TON Strategy Co.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
MSTR
Strategy Inc

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$60.05B
5Y Perf.+1344.5%
SMLR
Semler Scientific, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$311M
5Y Perf.-63.8%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.+91.6%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.22B
5Y Perf.+1506.0%

TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TONX logoTONX
MSTR logoMSTR
SMLR logoSMLR
BTBT logoBTBT
HUT logoHUT
IndustryAsset ManagementSoftware - ApplicationMedical - DevicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$184M$60.05B$311M$589M$11.22B
Revenue (TTM)$895K$490M$37M$164M$15M
Net Income (TTM)$76M$-12.36B$48M$137M$-312M
Gross Margin75.0%68.1%90.8%61.9%-6.1%
Operating Margin-13.0%94.2%-94.7%16.8%-21.0%
Forward P/E2.4x4.0x9.2x
Total Debt$464K$8.28B$70K$14M$429M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$2.30B$9M$95M$45M

TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TONX
MSTR
SMLR
BTBT
HUT
StockMay 20May 26Return
TON Strategy Co. (TONX)1000.0-100.0%
Strategy Inc (MSTR)1001444.5+1344.5%
Semler Scientific, … (SMLR)10036.2-63.8%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)100191.6+91.6%
Hut 8 Corp. (HUT)1001606.0+1506.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TONX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Strategy Inc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. SMLR and HUT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TONX
TON Strategy Co.
The Banking Pick

TONX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 13.2%, EPS growth 100.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 3.84x
  • NIM 4.5% vs BTBT's 0.1%
  • 13.2% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MSTR
Strategy Inc
The Income Pick

MSTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.59, yield 0.7%
  • Beta 2.59, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SMLR
Semler Scientific, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

SMLR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 11.1% 10Y total return vs MSTR's 8.6%
  • 130.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, BTBT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
The Banking Pick

HUT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +7.0% vs MSTR's -54.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTONX logoTONX13.2% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7%
ValueMSTR logoMSTRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSMLR logoSMLR130.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Stability / SafetyTONX logoTONXBeta 1.81 vs HUT's 4.51, lower leverage
DividendsMSTR logoMSTR0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HUT logoHUT+7.0% vs MSTR's -54.2%
Efficiency (ROA)TONX logoTONX42.1% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC -79.4% vs -9.9%

TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TONXTON Strategy Co.
FY 2022
SaaS Recurring Subscription Revenue
100.0%$8M
MSTRStrategy Inc
FY 2025
Product Licenses And Subscription Services
50.0%$215M
Subscription And Circulation
40.8%$176M
License
9.2%$40M
SMLRSemler Scientific, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
HUTHut 8 Corp.
FY 2025
High Performance Computing, Colocation And Cloud
86.1%$202M
Power
9.9%$23M
Digital Infrastructure
4.1%$10M

TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSTRLAGGINGBTBT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MSTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $490M annually — 548.0x TONX's $895,000. SMLR is the more profitable business, keeping 130.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%. On growth, MSTR holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTONX logoTONXTON Strategy Co.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncSMLR logoSMLRSemler Scientific…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$895,000$490M$37M$164M$15M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$30M$480M-$35M$166M-$389M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$76M-$12.4B$48M$137M-$312M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$15M$7.6B-$389M-$448M-$892M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.0%+68.1%+90.8%+61.9%-6.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.0%+94.2%-94.7%+16.8%-21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-11.5%-25.2%+130.8%+17.3%-15.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.2%+15.5%-10.5%-65.3%-22.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%-44.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+158.4%-132.0%+48.6%+2.8%-52.3%
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TONX and BTBT each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 4.0x trailing earnings, SMLR trades at a 57% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMLR's 14.0x.

MetricTONX logoTONXTON Strategy Co.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncSMLR logoSMLRSemler Scientific…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.
Market CapShares × price$184M$60.1B$311M$589M$11.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$177M$66.0B$302M$508M$11.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-186.78x-11.81x3.96x9.15x-47.28x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.18x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.04x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue205.28x125.83x5.52x3.60x743.95x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.12x1.04x0.70x0.56x6.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — TONX and BTBT each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — TONX and SMLR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TONX delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MSTR. SMLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUT's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TONX scores 6/9 vs HUT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTONX logoTONXTON Strategy Co.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncSMLR logoSMLRSemler Scientific…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+44.2%-24.1%+10.5%+21.4%-17.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+42.1%-19.4%+8.1%+19.0%-11.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-79.4%-9.9%+13.3%+6.5%-13.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-116.5%-12.6%+13.7%+8.5%-17.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–963462
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.16x0.00x0.03x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M$6.0B-$9M-$81M$384M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$2.3B$9M$95M$45M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$464,000$8.3B$70,000$14M$429M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense45245.50x9.05x-12.85x-9.18x
Evenly matched — TONX and SMLR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HUT five years ago would be worth $39,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for TONX. Over the past 12 months, HUT leads with a +699.2% total return vs MSTR's -54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUT at 124.4% vs TONX's -78.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTONX logoTONXTON Strategy Co.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncSMLR logoSMLRSemler Scientific…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.9%+14.4%+14.3%-10.3%+97.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-41.9%-54.2%-38.5%-9.0%+699.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%+510.2%-18.9%-19.7%+1030.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+189.8%-81.8%-84.6%+296.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+855.6%+1110.1%-60.4%+462.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-78.7%+82.7%-6.8%-7.1%+124.4%
HUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TONX and HUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TONX is the less volatile stock with a 1.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUT's 4.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUT currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs TONX's 10.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTONX logoTONXTON Strategy Co.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncSMLR logoSMLRSemler Scientific…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.81x2.59x2.48x3.37x4.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.77$457.22$50.44$4.55$111.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.75$104.17$14.88$1.25$12.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+10.9%+39.3%+40.3%+40.2%+90.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.268.852.469.182.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded408K18.8M018.5M4.6M
Evenly matched — TONX and HUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TONX as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", SMLR as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", HUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -22.4% for HUT (target: $79). For income investors, MSTR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs BTBT's 0.31%.

MetricTONX logoTONXTON Strategy Co.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncSMLR logoSMLRSemler Scientific…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$280.83$50.50$5.00$78.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2297215
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.30$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). HUT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallStrategy Inc (MSTR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TONX vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs HUT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TON Strategy Co.

(TONX) is the stronger pick with 1321% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TON Strategy Co. (TONX) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?

On trailing P/E, Semler Scientific, Inc.

(SMLR) is the cheapest at 4. 0x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?

Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) delivered a total return of +296. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for TON Strategy Co. (TONX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMLR returned +1110% versus TONX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TON Strategy Co.

(TONX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 81β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 149% more volatile than TONX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Hut 8 Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TON Strategy Co.

(TONX) is pulling ahead at 1321% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -162. 9% for Hut 8 Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMLR leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?

Semler Scientific, Inc.

(SMLR) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 7% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMLR leads at 37. 2% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMLR leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.

2% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT?

In this comparison, MSTR (0.

7% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TONX, SMLR, HUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TONX or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or HUT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TONX and MSTR and SMLR and BTBT and HUT?

These companies operate in different sectors (TONX (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and SMLR (Healthcare) and BTBT (Financial Services) and HUT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TONX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SMLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSTR pays a dividend while TONX, SMLR, BTBT, HUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TONX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 660%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSTR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMLR

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 78%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TONX and MSTR and SMLR and BTBT and HUT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TONX: 1320.6% · MSTR: 11.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.