TPC vs PWR

For growth investors, Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is the stronger pick with 28.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) offers the better valuation at 54. 9x trailing P/E (21. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is the cheapest at 54.

9x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Tutor Perini Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to +397. 5% for Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus TPC's +327. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Tutor Perini Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning TPC is approximately 29% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 37% for Tutor Perini Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is pulling ahead at 28.

1% versus 19. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tutor Perini Corporation grew EPS 148. 2% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PWR leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus 1. 5% for Tutor Perini Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PWR leads at 5. 8% versus 4. 2% for TPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PWR leads at 13. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) trades at 21.

4x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 36. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PWR: -13. 8% to $647. 23.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PWR: +31. 4%, TPC: +327. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.