Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TPET vs SOC vs BATL vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
TPET vs SOC vs BATL vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.84T | $47M | $32.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $399K | $1M | $165M | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-498M | $12M | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | -8.7% | 72.8% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | -367.6% | -4.0% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | 12.4x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $467K | $0.00 | $23M | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $882K | $98M | $28M | $2.21B |
TPET vs SOC vs BATL vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 126.1 | +26.1% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 40.6 | -59.4% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TPET vs SOC vs BATL vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TPET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 87.0%, EPS growth 81.5%
- 87.0% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs HAL's 16.2%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.8x)
BATL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -1.71, yield 100.0%
- 7.2% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +128.8% vs TPET's -63.2%
HAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57 vs SOC's 1.51
- 6.1% ROA vs TPET's -54.7%, ROIC 10.2% vs -38.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.0% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs TPET's -63.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs TPET's -54.7%, ROIC 10.2% vs -38.5% |
TPET vs SOC vs BATL vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TPET vs SOC vs BATL vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BATL leads in 2 of 6 categories
HAL leads 2 • TPET leads 0 • SOC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BATL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 55598.5x TPET's $398,734. BATL is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, TPET holds the edge at +123.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $398,734 | $1M | $165M | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$454M | $74M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$498M | $12M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$611M | $39M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | -8.7% | +72.8% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | -367.6% | -4.0% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.3% | -391.5% | +7.2% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -480.4% | +23.7% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +123.0% | — | -37.0% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.5% | -5.4% | +59.0% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOC and BATL each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.84T | $47M | $32.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1.84T | $42M | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.58x | -3.07x | -1.28x | 26.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x | 12.43x | 16.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 11.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.52x | — | 0.29x | 1.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 2359.43x | — | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 1.20x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. TPET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.5% | -113.8% | +14.5% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.7% | -28.9% | +2.4% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.5% | -44.6% | -3.4% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.6% | -37.5% | -1.8% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | — | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$414,983 | -$98M | -$5M | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $882,162 | $98M | $28M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $467,179 | $0 | $23M | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.03x | -2.28x | 0.57x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAL five years ago would be worth $18,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $102 for TPET. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs TPET's -63.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAL at 11.2% vs TPET's -77.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.4% | +9.5% | +140.3% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.2% | -36.8% | +128.8% | +105.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +26.5% | -54.3% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +32.6% | -77.5% | +82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +32.4% | -72.1% | +16.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.3% | +8.2% | -23.0% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TPET and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPET is the less volatile stock with a -2.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAL currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -2.78x | 1.51x | -1.71x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $35.00 | $29.70 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.35 | $3.72 | $1.00 | $19.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.5% | +36.7% | +9.6% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.1 | 45.8 | 37.6 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44.1M | 5.4M | 16.6M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SOC as "Buy", BATL as "Buy", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | — | $37.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 2 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +100.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.96 | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
BATL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). HAL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
TPET vs SOC vs BATL vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trio Petroleum Corp.
(TPET) is the stronger pick with 87. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Halliburton Company (HAL) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL?
On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp.
is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Halliburton Company (HAL) delivered a total return of +82.
6%, compared to -99. 0% for Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus TPET's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trio Petroleum Corp.
(TPET) is the lower-risk stock at -2. 78β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -155% more volatile than TPET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trio Petroleum Corp.
(TPET) is pulling ahead at 87. 0% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trio Petroleum Corp. grew EPS 81. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAL leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL?
Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
2% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAL leads at 10. 2% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Halliburton Company — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), HAL (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TPET, SOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TPET or SOC or BATL or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trio Petroleum Corp.
(TPET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -2. 78)). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPET: -99. 0%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TPET and SOC and BATL and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TPET is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BATL, HAL pay a dividend while TPET, SOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.