Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TPR vs VFC vs HBI vs CPRI vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
Luxury Goods
Apparel - Manufacturers
TPR vs VFC vs HBI vs CPRI vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Luxury Goods | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $26.71B | $7.45B | $2.29B | $2.23B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.85B | $9.58B | $3.44B | $3.71B | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $663M | $223M | $330M | $-504M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 76.2% | 53.8% | 42.0% | 61.4% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 4.6% | 13.1% | -1.8% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 23.1x | 9.8x | 13.4x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.90B | $5.37B | $2.55B | $3.10B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.10B | $429M | $215M | $166M | $748M |
TPR vs VFC vs HBI vs CPRI vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) | 100 | 959.7 | +859.7% |
| V.F. Corporation (VFC) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 124.3 | +24.3% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TPR vs VFC vs HBI vs CPRI vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth -76.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- 249.3% 10Y total return vs PVH's -1.9%
- Beta 1.53, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.87x
VFC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.9% yield, vs PVH's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HBI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 9.6% margin vs CPRI's -13.6%
Among these 5 stocks, CPRI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PVH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 66.0%, current ratio 1.27x
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.4x)
- Beta 1.48 vs VFC's 2.36, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs VFC's -9.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs VFC's 2.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, vs PVH's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.7% vs CPRI's +18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 6.8% vs -13.6% |
TPR vs VFC vs HBI vs CPRI vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TPR vs VFC vs HBI vs CPRI vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PVH leads in 1 of 6 categories
TPR leads 1 • VFC leads 0 • HBI leads 0 • CPRI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TPR and HBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 2.8x HBI's $3.4B. HBI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, TPR holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.9B | $9.6B | $3.4B | $3.7B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $748M | $496M | $72M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $663M | $223M | $330M | -$504M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | -$666M | -$8M | $491M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.2% | +53.8% | +42.0% | +61.4% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +4.6% | +13.1% | -1.8% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +2.3% | +9.6% | -13.6% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | -6.9% | -0.2% | +13.2% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +1.5% | -4.8% | -18.7% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.7% | +76.7% | +8.0% | +120.8% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 95% valuation discount to TPR's 159.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PVH's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TPR's 46.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.7B | $7.5B | $2.3B | $2.2B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.5B | $12.4B | $4.6B | $5.2B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 159.17x | -38.90x | -7.11x | -1.87x | 8.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.06x | 23.08x | 9.82x | 13.36x | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 46.12x | 22.05x | 16.64x | — | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.81x | 0.78x | 0.65x | 0.50x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 33.85x | 5.03x | 66.99x | 5.94x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.42x | 21.97x | 10.11x | 14.55x | 6.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TPR and PVH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPR delivers a 106.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $106 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. PVH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPR scores 7/9 vs CPRI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +106.4% | +12.5% | +73.9% | -4.7% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.2% | +2.1% | +7.7% | -15.1% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +2.7% | +4.5% | -13.6% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +3.5% | +5.4% | -17.0% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.55x | 3.61x | 75.02x | 8.34x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $4.9B | $2.3B | $2.9B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $429M | $215M | $166M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $5.4B | $2.6B | $3.1B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.58x | 3.79x | 2.15x | — | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPR five years ago would be worth $27,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,709 for VFC. Over the past 12 months, TPR leads with a +76.7% total return vs CPRI's +18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPR at 51.9% vs CPRI's -20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +5.5% | — | -23.4% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.7% | +52.7% | +32.3% | +18.4% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.6% | -7.4% | +49.1% | -50.5% | +7.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.3% | -72.9% | -66.4% | -68.6% | -24.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.3% | -45.4% | -62.6% | -63.1% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.9% | -2.5% | +14.2% | -20.9% | +2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBI and PVH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PVH is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VFC's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBI currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs CPRI's 66.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 2.36x | 1.72x | 2.03x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $161.97 | $22.16 | $7.05 | $28.27 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.65 | $11.06 | $3.96 | $15.37 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.6% | +86.0% | +91.8% | +66.1% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 54.2 | 44.3 | 47.3 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 6.0M | 104.2M | 2.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VFC and HBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPR as "Buy", VFC as "Hold", HBI as "Buy", CPRI as "Hold", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.5% upside for CPRI (target: $25) vs 6.3% for VFC (target: $20). For income investors, VFC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.87% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $162.38 | $20.27 | $7.25 | $25.33 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 58 | 34 | 53 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.9% | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | $0.36 | — | — | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.6% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +12.9% |
PVH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TPR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
TPR vs VFC vs HBI vs CPRI vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tapestry, Inc.
(TPR) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Tapestry, Inc. at 159. 2x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, Tapestry, Inc.
(TPR) delivered a total return of +178. 3%, compared to -72. 9% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPR returned +249. 3% versus CPRI's -63. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus V. F. Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning VFC is approximately 60% more volatile than PVH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PVH Corp. (PVH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tapestry, Inc.
(TPR) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: V. F. Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TPR leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH?
PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PVH leads at 8. 5% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPR leads at 75. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp.
(PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for V. F. Corporation — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 35. 5% to $25. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH?
In this comparison, VFC (1.
9% yield), TPR (1. 0% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HBI, CPRI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TPR or VFC or HBI or CPRI or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tapestry, Inc.
(TPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +249. 3% 10Y return). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPR: +249. 3%, CPRI: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TPR and VFC and HBI and CPRI and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TPR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. TPR, VFC pay a dividend while HBI, CPRI, PVH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.