Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TRMD vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TRMD
TORM plc

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$3.36B
5Y Perf.+313.9%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+297.6%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.38B
5Y Perf.+377.4%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+367.6%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$8.48B
5Y Perf.+317.3%

TRMD vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TRMD logoTRMD
INSW logoINSW
STNG logoSTNG
TNK logoTNK
FRO logoFRO
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$3.36B$4.46B$4.38B$2.83B$8.48B
Revenue (TTM)$1.29B$676M$1.04B$952M$1.77B
Net Income (TTM)$277M$546M$502M$351M$218M
Gross Margin47.2%40.6%51.8%27.5%26.5%
Operating Margin26.6%44.4%38.8%27.5%25.5%
Forward P/E6.6x8.5x8.6x6.0x6.0x
Total Debt$1.23B$576M$619M$55M$3.75B
Cash & Equiv.$272M$117M$752M$831M$414M

TRMD vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs FROLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TRMD
INSW
STNG
TNK
FRO
StockMay 20May 26Return
TORM plc (TRMD)100413.9+313.9%
International Seawa… (INSW)100397.6+297.6%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100477.4+377.4%
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100467.6+367.6%
Frontline Ltd. (FRO)100417.3+317.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TRMD vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSW leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. TORM plc is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. STNG, TNK, and FRO also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TRMD
TORM plc
The Income Pick

TRMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 16.6%
  • 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Best for: income & stability
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 10.1% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.1%
  • 80.8% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
  • +160.2% vs TNK's +80.3%
  • 20.1% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 9.4% vs 10.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.28 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Value Pick

TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs TRMD's 0.29
  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
Best for: valuation efficiency
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
The Growth Play

FRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
  • 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRO logoFRO13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW80.8% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
Stability / SafetySTNG logoSTNGBeta 0.28 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
DividendsTRMD logoTRMD16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+160.2% vs TNK's +80.3%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW20.1% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 9.4% vs 10.6%

TRMD vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TRMDTORM plc
FY 2024
Others
100.0%$1M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
59.3%$1.1B
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.4%$547M
Other revenue
7.6%$136M
Time-charter
1.4%$26M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.7%$13M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
0.6%$11M
FROFrontline Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage Charter
95.3%$2.0B
Time Charter
4.1%$85M
Administrative Income
0.5%$10M

TRMD vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTRMDLAGGINGFRO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.6x INSW's $676M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTRMD logoTRMDTORM plcINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$676M$1.0B$952M$1.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$555M$465M$580M$348M$781M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$277M$546M$502M$351M$218M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$242M$193M$389M$113M$557M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.2%+40.6%+51.8%+27.5%+26.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.6%+44.4%+38.8%+27.5%+25.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.4%+80.8%+48.4%+36.9%+12.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.7%+28.5%+37.5%+11.8%+31.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.8%-91.3%+46.2%-26.4%-11.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-43.0%+4.8%+2.5%+46.0%-33.3%
Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 70% valuation discount to FRO's 17.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMD offers better value at 0.23x vs FRO's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTRMD logoTRMDTORM plcINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$3.4B$4.5B$4.4B$2.8B$8.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.3B$4.9B$4.3B$2.1B$11.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.21x14.48x12.05x8.05x17.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.62x8.52x8.58x6.00x5.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.23x0.36x0.26x0.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.07x10.48x8.68x6.80x10.54x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.15x5.29x4.67x2.97x4.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.54x2.21x1.30x1.38x3.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.38x117.08x8.92x25.09x
TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRO. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTRMD logoTRMDTORM plcINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.9%+27.1%+15.9%+17.2%+9.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.7%+20.1%+12.6%+15.7%+3.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.0%+9.4%+7.2%+12.5%+10.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+22.8%+12.1%+8.4%+10.9%+14.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946645
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.59x0.29x0.19x0.03x1.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$954M$459M-$133M-$776M$3.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$272M$117M$752M$831M$414M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$576M$619M$55M$3.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.61x0.90x6.82x109.95x1.87x
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45,904 for STNG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs TNK's +80.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 44.8% vs TRMD's 16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTRMD logoTRMDTORM plcINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+70.8%+96.5%+71.3%+58.3%+90.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+113.4%+160.2%+115.3%+80.3%+132.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+57.3%+179.7%+92.7%+136.5%+203.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+435.1%+438.1%+359.0%+513.8%+465.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+585.5%+1014.5%+62.8%+187.7%+513.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.3%+40.9%+24.4%+33.2%+44.8%
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs TRMD's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTRMD logoTRMDTORM plcINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.54x0.43x0.28x0.35x0.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$34.88$91.58$87.39$83.54$39.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.79$35.60$37.96$41.05$16.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.9%+98.5%+96.9%+97.3%+95.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.367.360.557.961.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded924K597K1.2M542K4.0M
Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TRMD and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TRMD as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", FRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs STNG's 1.99%.

MetricTRMD logoTRMDTORM plcINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$83.33$85.33$90.00$38.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts313312322
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+16.6%+3.2%+2.0%+2.4%+5.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00300
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.48$2.92$1.69$1.98$1.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — TRMD and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TRMD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TNK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallTORM plc (TRMD)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TRMD vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TORM plc (TRMD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO?

On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.

2x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +359. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus TORM plc's 0. 54β — meaning TRMD is approximately 93% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO?

TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.

3% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

09

Is TRMD or INSW or STNG or TNK or FRO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, STNG: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TRMD and INSW and STNG and TNK and FRO?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TRMD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 6.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSW

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 48%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STNG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 23%
  • Net Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TNK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FRO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TRMD and INSW and STNG and TNK and FRO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TRMD: -7.8% · INSW: -91.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(TRMD: 21.4% · INSW: 80.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TRMD: 5.2x · INSW: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.