Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TRMD vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
TRMD vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.44B | $1.32B | $4.37B | $2.89B | $8.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.29B | $779M | $1.04B | $952M | $1.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $277M | $110M | $502M | $351M | $218M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 33.4% | 51.8% | 27.5% | 26.5% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 27.0% | 38.8% | 27.5% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.2x | 6.5x | 6.6x | 6.1x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.23B | $1.76B | $619M | $55M | $3.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $272M | $348M | $752M | $831M | $414M |
TRMD vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 424.0 | +324.0% |
| Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 475.8 | +375.8% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 477.7 | +377.7% |
| Frontline Ltd. (FRO) | 100 | 432.7 | +332.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRMD vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.3%
- 16.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
TEN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 5.6%
- PEG 0.09 vs TRMD's 0.27
- PEG 0.09 vs 0.19
- +164.1% vs TNK's +93.6%
STNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.22, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- 48.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
- Beta 0.22 vs TRMD's 0.52, lower leverage
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 15.7% ROA vs TEN's 3.0%, ROIC 12.5% vs 6.9%
FRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | PEG 0.09 vs 0.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs TRMD's 0.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.2% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +164.1% vs TNK's +93.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs TEN's 3.0%, ROIC 12.5% vs 6.9% |
TRMD vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRMD vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STNG leads in 1 of 6 categories
TEN leads 1 • TNK leads 1 • TRMD leads 0 • FRO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.3x TEN's $779M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $779M | $1.0B | $952M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $555M | $327M | $580M | $348M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $277M | $110M | $502M | $351M | $218M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $242M | -$503M | $389M | $113M | $557M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +33.4% | +51.8% | +27.5% | +26.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +27.0% | +38.8% | +27.5% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +14.1% | +48.4% | +36.9% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | -64.5% | +37.5% | +11.8% | +31.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | -9.7% | +46.2% | -26.4% | -11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.0% | -71.6% | +2.5% | +46.0% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TEN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 70% valuation discount to FRO's 17.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TEN offers better value at 0.12x vs FRO's 0.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $1.3B | $4.4B | $2.9B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $2.7B | $4.2B | $2.1B | $12.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.33x | 8.71x | 12.01x | 8.22x | 17.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.24x | 6.53x | 6.65x | 6.13x | 6.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.23x | 0.12x | 0.36x | 0.26x | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.16x | 6.54x | 8.65x | 7.00x | 10.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 1.64x | 4.66x | 3.03x | 4.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 0.73x | 1.29x | 1.41x | 3.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.74x | — | 8.89x | 25.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $6 for TEN. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +6.2% | +15.9% | +17.2% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.7% | +3.0% | +12.6% | +15.7% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.0% | +6.9% | +7.2% | +12.5% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.8% | +8.8% | +8.4% | +10.9% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.00x | 0.19x | 0.03x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $954M | $1.4B | -$133M | -$776M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272M | $348M | $752M | $831M | $414M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.8B | $619M | $55M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.61x | 2.06x | 6.82x | 109.95x | 1.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TEN and FRO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $62,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45,005 for STNG. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +164.1% total return vs TNK's +93.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 46.3% vs TRMD's 17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.9% | +102.4% | +70.8% | +61.7% | +97.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.3% | +164.1% | +111.6% | +93.6% | +141.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.1% | +190.5% | +92.1% | +141.2% | +213.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +418.0% | +387.9% | +350.1% | +526.1% | +477.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +596.2% | +76.7% | +62.3% | +193.3% | +531.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.0% | +42.7% | +24.3% | +34.1% | +46.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STNG and FRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.31x | 0.22x | 0.36x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.88 | $44.57 | $87.39 | $83.99 | $39.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.79 | $17.08 | $37.96 | $41.05 | $16.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +98.3% | +96.6% | +98.9% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 70.5 | 64.1 | 61.6 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 912K | 484K | 1.2M | 525K | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRMD and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMD as "Buy", TEN as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", FRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.2% upside for TEN (target: $50) vs -2.6% for FRO (target: $39). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.17% vs STNG's 2.00%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $50.00 | $86.33 | $90.00 | $38.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 26 | 31 | 23 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.2% | +5.6% | +2.0% | +2.4% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.48 | $2.43 | $1.69 | $1.98 | $1.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
STNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
TRMD vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs FRO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TORM plc (TRMD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
3x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited wins at 0. 09x versus TORM plc's 0. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +526. 1%, compared to +350. 1% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +596. 2% versus STNG's +62. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus TORM plc's 0. 52β — meaning TRMD is approximately 135% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus 21. 9% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus TORM plc's 0. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 6. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 14. 2% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is TRMD or TEN or STNG or TNK or FRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 4. 9% yield, +531. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRO: +531. 6%, TEN: +76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRMD and TEN and STNG and TNK and FRO?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.