Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TRMD vs TNK vs FRO vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
TRMD vs TNK vs FRO vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.36B | $2.83B | $8.48B | $4.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.29B | $952M | $1.77B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $277M | $351M | $218M | $502M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 27.5% | 26.5% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 27.5% | 25.5% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 6.0x | 6.0x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.23B | $55M | $3.75B | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $272M | $831M | $414M | $752M |
TRMD vs TNK vs FRO vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 413.9 | +313.9% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
| Frontline Ltd. (FRO) | 100 | 417.3 | +317.3% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 477.4 | +377.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRMD vs TNK vs FRO vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRMD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 16.6%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.1%
- 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
TNK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs TRMD's 0.29
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 6.6x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.29
- 15.7% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 10.6%
FRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- +132.3% vs TNK's +80.3%
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- 48.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3%
- Beta 0.28 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 6.6x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.29 | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs FRO's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.3% vs TNK's +80.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 10.6% |
TRMD vs TNK vs FRO vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TRMD vs TNK vs FRO vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STNG leads in 1 of 6 categories
TRMD leads 1 • TNK leads 1 • FRO leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 1.9x TNK's $952M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $952M | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $555M | $348M | $781M | $580M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $277M | $351M | $218M | $502M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $242M | $113M | $557M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +27.5% | +26.5% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +27.5% | +25.5% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +36.9% | +12.3% | +48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +11.8% | +31.5% | +37.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | -26.4% | -11.8% | +46.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.0% | +46.0% | -33.3% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 70% valuation discount to FRO's 17.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMD offers better value at 0.23x vs FRO's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $2.8B | $8.5B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $2.1B | $11.8B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.21x | 8.05x | 17.09x | 12.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.62x | 6.00x | 5.99x | 8.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.23x | 0.26x | 0.73x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.07x | 6.80x | 10.54x | 8.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.15x | 2.97x | 4.14x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 1.38x | 3.62x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.38x | 25.09x | — | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRO. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +17.2% | +9.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.7% | +15.7% | +3.8% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.0% | +12.5% | +10.6% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.8% | +10.9% | +14.1% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.03x | 1.60x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $954M | -$776M | $3.3B | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272M | $831M | $414M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $55M | $3.7B | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.61x | 109.95x | 1.87x | 6.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45,904 for STNG. Over the past 12 months, FRO leads with a +132.3% total return vs TNK's +80.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 44.8% vs TRMD's 16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +70.8% | +58.3% | +90.1% | +71.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +113.4% | +80.3% | +132.3% | +115.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.3% | +136.5% | +203.4% | +92.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +435.1% | +513.8% | +465.7% | +359.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +585.5% | +187.7% | +513.5% | +62.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.3% | +33.2% | +44.8% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TNK and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.35x | 0.36x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.88 | $83.54 | $39.89 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.79 | $41.05 | $16.25 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +97.3% | +95.5% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 57.9 | 61.4 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 924K | 542K | 4.0M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRMD and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMD as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", FRO as "Hold", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs 0.8% for STNG (target: $85). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $90.00 | $38.50 | $85.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 23 | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.6% | +2.4% | +5.1% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.48 | $1.98 | $1.95 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
STNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TRMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TRMD vs TNK vs FRO vs STNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TORM plc (TRMD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +359. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +585. 5% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus TORM plc's 0. 54β — meaning TRMD is approximately 93% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is TRMD or TNK or FRO or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 5. 1% yield, +513. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRO: +513. 5%, STNG: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRMD and TNK and FRO and STNG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.