Industrial - Distribution
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TRNS vs MGRC vs KFRC vs URI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Rental & Leasing Services
TRNS vs MGRC vs KFRC vs URI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $852M | $2.83B | $914M | $67.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $333M | $947M | $1.33B | $16.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $155M | $35M | $2.51B |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 45.9% | 27.2% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 25.5% | 3.8% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | 51.9x | 18.1x | 20.8x | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $528M | $70M | $16.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $295K | $2M | $459M |
TRNS vs MGRC vs KFRC vs URI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) | 100 | 352.9 | +252.9% |
| McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) | 100 | 213.1 | +113.1% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 720.8 | +620.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRNS vs MGRC vs KFRC vs URI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TRNS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 19.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
MGRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 20.8x)
- 16.4% margin vs TRNS's 2.0%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.27, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.27 vs TRNS's 1.35
URI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth -0.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 14.6% 10Y total return vs TRNS's 7.7%
- PEG 0.88 vs MGRC's 2.05
- +50.9% vs MGRC's +1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs TRNS's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs TRNS's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs MGRC's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.9% vs MGRC's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs TRNS's 1.4%, ROIC 19.1% vs 2.6% |
TRNS vs MGRC vs KFRC vs URI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TRNS vs MGRC vs KFRC vs URI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGRC leads in 2 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 2 • URI leads 1 • TRNS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 49.2x TRNS's $333M. MGRC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRNS's 2.0%. On growth, TRNS holds the edge at +15.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $333M | $947M | $1.3B | $16.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $350M | $56M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $155M | $35M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $196M | $43M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +45.9% | +27.2% | +36.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +25.5% | +3.8% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +16.4% | +2.6% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +20.7% | +3.3% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.8% | +1.6% | +0.1% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.3% | -4.3% | +2.2% | +5.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MGRC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, MGRC trades at a 89% valuation discount to TRNS's 160.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 1.07x vs MGRC's 2.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $852M | $2.8B | $914M | $67.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $976M | $3.4B | $981M | $83.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 160.11x | 18.12x | 25.51x | 27.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 51.85x | 18.07x | 20.77x | 22.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.05x | — | 1.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.76x | 9.55x | 17.64x | 11.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.57x | 2.99x | 0.69x | 4.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 2.29x | 7.13x | 7.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 43.60x | 13.38x | 19.53x | 101.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $2 for TRNS. MGRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to URI's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRC scores 6/9 vs URI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +12.8% | +27.2% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +6.6% | +9.2% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +10.5% | +19.1% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +11.3% | +20.1% | +15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.43x | 0.56x | 1.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $124M | $528M | $68M | $16.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $295,000 | $2M | $459M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $528M | $70M | $16.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.81x | 8.35x | — | 5.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $36,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,077 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +50.9% total return vs MGRC's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 41.0% vs KFRC's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.7% | +10.3% | +62.1% | +27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.9% | +1.1% | +25.9% | +50.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | +23.3% | -11.1% | +180.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.3% | +47.5% | -9.2% | +262.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +769.1% | +334.3% | +226.5% | +1461.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.3% | +7.2% | -3.9% | +41.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRNS's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs MGRC's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.75x | 0.27x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $94.76 | $128.41 | $50.70 | $1106.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.23 | $94.99 | $24.49 | $682.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.3% | +89.6% | +98.6% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 60.7 | 73.3 | 65.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 155K | 198K | 239K | 488K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MGRC and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRNS as "Buy", MGRC as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", URI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.0% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 0.0% for URI (target: $1074). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.09% vs URI's 0.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $123.60 | $140.00 | $71.00 | $1074.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 10 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +3.1% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 34 | 8 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.94 | $1.55 | $7.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +5.6% | +2.9% |
MGRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KFRC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
TRNS vs MGRC vs KFRC vs URI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transcat, Inc.
(TRNS) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI?
On trailing P/E, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the cheapest at 18.
1x versus Transcat, Inc. at 160. 1x. On forward P/E, McGrath RentCorp is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 88x versus McGrath RentCorp's 2. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +262. 3%, compared to -9. 2% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1461% versus KFRC's +226. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Transcat, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning TRNS is approximately 399% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 184% for United Rentals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transcat, Inc.
(TRNS) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -63. 7% for Transcat, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGRC leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI?
McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus 1. 6% for Transcat, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRC leads at 25. 9% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGRC leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 88x versus McGrath RentCorp's 2. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 51. 9x for Transcat, Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 42. 0% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
1% yield), MGRC (1. 7% yield), URI (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TRNS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TRNS or MGRC or KFRC or URI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 7% yield, +1461% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1461%, TRNS: +769. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRNS and MGRC and KFRC and URI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TRNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MGRC, KFRC, URI pay a dividend while TRNS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.