TROX vs SHW

For growth investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger pick with 2.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) offers the better valuation at 31. 5x trailing P/E (27. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) delivered a total return of +18.

1%, compared to -47. 9% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +255. 1% versus TROX's +104. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

79β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 199% more volatile than SHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is pulling ahead at 2.

1% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Sherwin-Williams Company grew EPS -2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHW leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

9% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHW leads at 16. 1% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHW: 20.

3% to $389. 43.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 0% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

79), 1. 0% yield, +255. 1% 10Y return). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHW: +255. 1%, TROX: +104. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.