TRT vs NVEC vs RELL

For growth investors, Richardson Electronics, Ltd.

(RELL) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Trio-Tech International (TRT). NVE Corporation (NVEC) offers the better valuation at 28. 2x trailing P/E (18. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (RELL) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, NVE Corporation is actually cheaper at 18.

9x.

Over the past 5 years, Trio-Tech International (TRT) delivered a total return of +124.

8%, compared to +38. 6% for NVE Corporation (NVEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRT returned +248. 3% versus NVEC's +124. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trio-Tech International (TRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

52β versus Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 's 2. 02β — meaning RELL is approximately 286% more volatile than TRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVE Corporation (NVEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Trio-Tech International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Richardson Electronics, Ltd.

(RELL) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus -13. 8% for Trio-Tech International (TRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVE Corporation grew EPS 1. 0% year-over-year, compared to -104. 0% for Trio-Tech International. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELL leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NVE Corporation (NVEC) is the more profitable company, earning 57.

7% net margin versus -0. 5% for Richardson Electronics, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 57. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVEC leads at 60. 5% versus -1. 2% for RELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVEC leads at 78. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, NVE Corporation (NVEC) trades at 18.

9x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Richardson Electronics, Ltd. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, NVEC (4.

5% yield), RELL (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Trio-Tech International (TRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), +248. 3% 10Y return). Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (RELL) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRT: +248. 3%, RELL: +228. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVEC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RELL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NVEC, RELL pay a dividend while TRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.