TRUG vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS

For growth investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 28. 9x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) delivered a total return of +81. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOLF returned +434. 4% versus TRUG's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TruGolf Holdings, Inc.

(TRUG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 92β — meaning MODG is approximately 843% more volatile than TRUG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 137% versus 172% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -13. 6% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acushnet Holdings Corp. grew EPS -8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MODG leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus -80. 7% for TruGolf Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus -32. 3% for TRUG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 28. 4% to $47. 60.

In this comparison, GOLF (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. TRUG, MODG, PRKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, TruGolf Holdings, Inc.

(TRUG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20)). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRUG: -100. 0%, MODG: +37. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TRUG (Technology) and GOLF (Consumer Cyclical) and MODG (Consumer Cyclical) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TRUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MODG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. GOLF pays a dividend while TRUG, MODG, PRKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.