Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TS vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
TS vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $31.63B | $1.84T | $79.62B | $32.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.97B | $1M | $35.71B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.93B | $-498M | $3.35B | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 32.1% | -8.7% | 18.2% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.1% | -367.6% | 15.3% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 7.5x | 19.8x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $449M | $0.00 | $12.31B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $573M | $98M | $3.04B | $2.21B |
TS vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenaris S.A. (TS) | 100 | 275.7 | +175.7% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 196.1 | +96.1% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 200.1 | +100.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TS vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.9%
- 170.0% 10Y total return vs HAL's 16.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 3.87x
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.9%, current ratio 3.87x
SOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs TS's -4.3%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.8x)
SLB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +105.6% vs SOC's -36.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs TS's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SLB's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.6% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.5% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs -44.6% |
TS vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TS vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TS leads in 5 of 6 categories
SOC leads 0 • SLB leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 28095.2x SOC's $1M. TS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, TS holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.0B | $1M | $35.7B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | -$454M | $7.4B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | -$498M | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | -$611M | $4.8B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.1% | -8.7% | +18.2% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | -367.6% | +15.3% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | -391.5% | +9.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | -480.4% | +13.4% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | — | +5.0% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.5% | -5.4% | -31.2% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, TS trades at a 39% valuation discount to HAL's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TS's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31.6B | $1.84T | $79.6B | $32.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.5B | $1.84T | $88.9B | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.85x | -3.07x | 22.57x | 26.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.41x | 7.50x | 19.79x | 16.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.87x | — | 12.07x | 11.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.64x | — | 2.23x | 1.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 2359.43x | 2.89x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.96x | — | 16.60x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. TS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TS scores 6/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | -113.8% | +13.9% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | -28.9% | +6.5% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | -44.6% | +12.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.8% | -37.5% | +14.3% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 0.45x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$124M | -$98M | $9.3B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $573M | $98M | $3.0B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $449M | $0 | $12.3B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 53.57x | -2.28x | 9.40x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TS five years ago would be worth $27,096 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +105.6% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TS at 31.6% vs SLB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.9% | +9.5% | +32.7% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.0% | -36.8% | +61.8% | +105.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.1% | +26.5% | +20.8% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.0% | +32.6% | +80.6% | +82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.0% | +32.4% | -9.2% | +16.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | +8.2% | +6.5% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TS and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TS is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 1.51x | 0.87x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.33 | $35.00 | $57.20 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.00 | $3.72 | $31.64 | $19.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +36.7% | +92.7% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 45.8 | 57.9 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 5.4M | 16.3M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
TS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TS as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, TS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.94% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.94 | $27.00 | $56.95 | $37.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 4 | 66 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — | +2.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.73 | — | $1.08 | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +3.1% |
TS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
TS vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TS or SOC or SLB or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Tenaris S. A. (TS). Tenaris S. A. (TS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tenaris S. A. (TS) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TS or SOC or SLB or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Tenaris S.
A. (TS) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TS or SOC or SLB or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Tenaris S.
A. (TS) delivered a total return of +171. 0%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TS returned +170. 0% versus SLB's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TS or SOC or SLB or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tenaris S.
A. (TS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 221% more volatile than TS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tenaris S. A. (TS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TS or SOC or SLB or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SLB N.
V. (SLB) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -4. 3% for Tenaris S. A. (TS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -48. 6% for Tenaris S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TS or SOC or SLB or HAL?
Tenaris S.
A. (TS) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TS leads at 19. 1% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TS leads at 34. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TS or SOC or SLB or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for SLB N. V. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TS or SOC or SLB or HAL?
In this comparison, TS (2.
9% yield), SLB (2. 0% yield), HAL (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TS or SOC or SLB or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tenaris S.
A. (TS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 2. 9% yield, +170. 0% 10Y return). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TS: +170. 0%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TS and SOC and SLB and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TS, SLB, HAL pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.