TSE
Trinseo PLC
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-99.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TSE vs HUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
Chemicals
Market Cap$2.56B
5Y Perf.-30.3%
TSE vs HUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TSE | HUN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $5M | $2.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.13B | $5.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-412M | $-324M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -1.0% |
| Total Debt | $2.48B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $210M | $429M |
TSE vs HUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TSE
HUN
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trinseo PLC (TSE) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSE vs HUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HUN leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Trinseo PLC is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TSE
Trinseo PLC
The Income Pick
TSE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.94, yield 38.5%
- Rev growth -4.4%, EPS growth 50.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.1%
- Beta 2.94, yield 38.5%, current ratio 1.37x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
HUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 57.6% 10Y total return vs TSE's -79.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 92.5%, current ratio 1.30x
- -5.7% margin vs TSE's -13.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TSE | -4.4% revenue growth vs HUN's -5.8% |
| Quality / Margins | HUN | -5.7% margin vs TSE's -13.2% |
| Stability / Safety | HUN | Beta 1.73 vs TSE's 2.94 |
| Dividends | TSE | 38.5% yield, vs HUN's 5.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HUN | +37.5% vs TSE's -96.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HUN | -4.6% ROA vs TSE's -15.8%, ROIC -0.6% vs -2.0% |
TSE vs HUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
TSE vs HUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTSELAGGINGHUN
HUNHuntsman Corporation
3leads
TSETrinseo PLC
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HUNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HUN5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TSE2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TSE4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
HUN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
HUN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TSE1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 1.8x TSE's $3.1B. HUN is the more profitable business, keeping -5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSE's -13.2%. On growth, HUN holds the edge at +0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $88M | $160M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$412M | -$324M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$96M | $135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | -5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.3% | +0.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | -3.3% |
HUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TSE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TSE's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUN's 19.6x.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -9.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.84x | 19.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.11x |
TSE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSE scores 5/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.8% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $210M | $429M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.43x | -1.08x |
TSE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUN five years ago would be worth $6,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $346 for TSE. Over the past 12 months, HUN leads with a +37.5% total return vs TSE's -96.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUN at -12.6% vs TSE's -76.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.6% | +45.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.9% | +37.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -33.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | +57.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.4% | -12.6% |
HUN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUN is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSE's 2.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TSE's 2.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.94x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.42 | $15.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $7.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.8% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 629K | 6.2M |
HUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TSE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TSE offers the higher dividend yield at 38.53% vs HUN's 5.74%.
| Metric | TSETrinseo PLC | HUNHuntsman Corporat… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +38.5% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
TSE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
HUN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TSE leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallTrinseo PLC (TSE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TSE vs HUN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSE or HUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trinseo PLC (TSE) is the stronger pick with -4.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Analysts rate Huntsman Corporation (HUN) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TSE or HUN?
Over the past 5 years, Huntsman Corporation (HUN) delivered a total return of -39.
8%, compared to -96. 5% for Trinseo PLC (TSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUN returned +57. 6% versus TSE's -79. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TSE or HUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huntsman Corporation (HUN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Trinseo PLC's 2. 94β — meaning TSE is approximately 69% more volatile than HUN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TSE or HUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trinseo PLC (TSE) is pulling ahead at -4.
4% versus -5. 8% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trinseo PLC grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -44. 5% for Huntsman Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSE leads at -10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TSE or HUN?
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
8% net margin versus -9. 9% for Trinseo PLC — meaning it keeps -4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUN leads at -0. 7% versus -1. 3% for TSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUN leads at 13. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TSE or HUN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Trinseo PLC (TSE) offers the highest yield at 38. 5%, versus 5. 7% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN).
07Is TSE or HUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Huntsman Corporation (HUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (5.
7% yield). Trinseo PLC (TSE) carries a higher beta of 2. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUN: +57. 6%, TSE: -79. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TSE and HUN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TSE: -14.3% · HUN: 0.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.