TSE vs KRO

For growth investors, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

(KRO) is the stronger pick with -1. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Trinseo PLC (TSE). Analysts rate Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

(KRO) delivered a total return of -41. 7%, compared to -96. 4% for Trinseo PLC (TSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRO returned +133. 2% versus TSE's -79. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

(KRO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 62β versus Trinseo PLC's 3. 15β — meaning TSE is approximately 94% more volatile than KRO relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

(KRO) is pulling ahead at -1. 5% versus -4. 4% for Trinseo PLC (TSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trinseo PLC grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -228. 0% for Kronos Worldwide, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRO leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

(KRO) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 0% net margin versus -9. 9% for Trinseo PLC — meaning it keeps -6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSE leads at -1. 3% versus -2. 3% for KRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRO leads at 11. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Trinseo PLC (TSE) offers the highest yield at 38. 5%, versus 2. 7% for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.

(KRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 7% yield, +133. 2% 10Y return). Trinseo PLC (TSE) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRO: +133. 2%, TSE: -79. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TSE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.